From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECBD21582EF for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gentoo.org (bobolink.gentoo.org [140.211.166.189]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: relay-lists.gentoo.org@gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6918343192 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bobolink.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bobolink.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00FD110478; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bobolink.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 077261102A2 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 2212) id DAEAB343096; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A88343095 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:56:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Andrey Grozin To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: USE flag: gui or X? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4102d3da-a1d6-04bd-2a37-d30209e536c1@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Archives-Salt: 5202ae4b-dcf4-4c03-b277-45483440da04 X-Archives-Hash: 3111833c8fad5089617c891adf13e5a5 On Thu, 20 Feb 2025, Duncan wrote: > pyqt *5*? What's upstream's story on pyqt6 support? Kinda weird to have > a new major version still stuck on qt5. Is it even worth the time's- > ticking flag and dep or will it just need removed in a few months when the > last pyqt5 revdeps are cleaned up? I see no traces of such activity upstream. I've filed an issue to their github issue tracker. Let's see what they will reply. There are *very* many useful programs using Qt5. For example, I'm using lumina desktop environment. I'm afraid there will be many such useful programs for many years... Andrey