From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5816138334 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B333E08A2; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FB0DE089E for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-218-46-55.hsd1.md.comcast.net [98.218.46.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mjo) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 515D534D266 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/3] elisp{,-common}.eclass update for emacs-vcs consolidation To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <3002c804-e70f-5b50-ee38-d91aa7e22fb0@gentoo.org> From: Michael Orlitzky Message-ID: Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 06:27:44 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 8da1b2c2-e04b-4c9a-8ba4-5db080cf3d35 X-Archives-Hash: 3f4889e5fda76c862036ca9bc248b859 On 12/21/19 1:57 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > See? You say it yourself, with 400 revbumps there is quite some chance > for breakage. > I was being safe, and assuming that your standards for shell scripting are as low as your standards for tree quality.