From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EA28158086 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:23:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 724D62BC042; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:23:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22A082BC001 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [78.35.183.83] (helo=[192.168.1.12]) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzHho-0004R5-Rt for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 13:23:52 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 13:23:40 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category: net-servers Content-Language: en-US To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <2550c02d-b646-589e-a93c-3e5f550686af@gentoo.org> From: Jonas Stein In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Df-Sender: anNAam9uYXNzdGVpbi5kZQ== X-Archives-Salt: 9b5f93b9-d27f-498e-81f2-66f6130d376c X-Archives-Hash: 33c881816ba545f5e22f82bfa0ebc1c0 On 20/12/2021 09.05, Anna “CyberTailor” wrote: > On 2021-12-20 01:18, Jonas Stein wrote: >> I think we need a more precise definition if we do not want this. > > "servers for miscellaneous application-level network protocols"? sounds like server-misc/* what is the benefit? https://xkcd.com/1077/ I do not think this is a good idea. Categories should be as sharp and clear as possible. -- Best, Jonas