From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C14BB15852A for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 05:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83BD72BC021; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 05:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A5BDE2A5A for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 05:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:05:48 +0300 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling optional, expensive variants of test suite Content-Language: en-US To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <87zfplr9g0.fsf@gentoo.org> From: Joonas Niilola In-Reply-To: <87zfplr9g0.fsf@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------7eLOQ0QM6SMyOps9SWPySrV0" X-Archives-Salt: 02a7bf47-de1e-4820-af98-1920b14b99d6 X-Archives-Hash: 8a1e26dbb8239c95ab0ac6d4f14abe0d This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------7eLOQ0QM6SMyOps9SWPySrV0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------nARpTB7tq8RVt5bfsocqXQhK"; protected-headers="v1" From: Joonas Niilola To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling optional, expensive variants of test suite References: <87zfplr9g0.fsf@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <87zfplr9g0.fsf@gentoo.org> --------------nARpTB7tq8RVt5bfsocqXQhK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey, On 9.8.2024 18.40, Sam James wrote: > Hi! >=20 > Some packages like libffi, gcc support extended, slower versions of > their testsuites. In the past, I've seen both USE=3D"expensive-tests" (= I > think) and USE=3D"test-full" (used in a few places in-tree atm) for thi= s. >=20 > I sort of hate both suggestions but I'm open to what people think is > best, with a view to then making it a global USE flag then? Thoughts? >=20 Count NSS in that list too! I've made a patch locally that uses "tests-full" use flag, so I guess I'd vote for "test-full" to stay consistent. -- juippis --------------nARpTB7tq8RVt5bfsocqXQhK-- --------------7eLOQ0QM6SMyOps9SWPySrV0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEEltRJ9L6XRmDQCngHc4OUK43AaWIFAma+3ixfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDk2 RDQ0OUY0QkU5NzQ2NjBEMDBBNzgwNzczODM5NDJCOERDMDY5NjIACgkQc4OUK43A aWI/FAf9FTEteY1DVZMhHQPtulefcOFng8H5z7h1+ErSCXCYTNVhnTUidzKmtjnV JWnq1LvfOIfhWwjN97PA5yzHya9qt3nSD1pjq4kItsI40nByVaHsb5H8/Efonak8 bPqYZ6u/uMPB+eJZWmqtCsj/ZWh09b3PhstpK7Kf3MULht1lL1ZCn5ADi9AGoIrT eU1vxcOBY6d7ZVlx+ILqo1foA3PgO58t40C4Mm/r7Dw+xMlUmKSK5ektfkxw+UTb h2+ihKD+hmSb/a7iLzGSaBjVu7Vyp2XPZTO0Ly+XR/b0f+0Rpe919QTzpb0MQwi2 LEFBjmRzJbnvLIm+vJ1uZptEZCt9pQ== =UnYI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------7eLOQ0QM6SMyOps9SWPySrV0--