public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:39:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a16842f1-f4c3-8749-5d07-9478ed5b2ad2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1495621441.32169.1.camel@gentoo.org>

On 24/05/2017 12:24, Michał Górny wrote:
> On śro, 2017-05-24 at 03:48 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:41:25AM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote
>>> Next time such a thing happens, the discussion will happen on a
>>> completely private media or not happen at all because of the state
>>> of this mailing list. Is this what you really want?
>>
>>   Here's the part you did not quote...
>>
>>>> If we could have a guarantee of proposed changes like that being
>>>> posted on Gentoo-User for comment, rather than being sprung on
>>>> users by surprise, I'd be willing to sign off this list.
>>
>>   Note where I said "...posted on Gentoo-User for comment...".  What I'm
>> asking is for such proposed changes to be posted on Gentoo-User, and the
>> discussion/feedback/flamefests/etc will be on Gentoo-User.  This type of
>> surprise stuff seems to happen a lot in Open Source...
>>
>> * Gentoo /usr
>> * Firefox Australis UI, and dropping ALSA and going PulseAudio-only
>> * GNOME getting a hard-coded dependancy on systemd
>> * etc, etc
> 
> And what would be the use of those 'user comments'? Do you believe it
> would change anything? So what is the purpose of asking more users from
> feedback *we do not want*?
> 
> Would it make you feel better if you were asked to raise your objection?
> Would you feel better claiming that we did it against objections of many
> users? Or do you believe we would abandon it and decide not to do
> anything because of the resulting bikeshed -- which seems to be
> a recurring theme lately?
> 
> Yes, I *do not want feedback* on *how to do Gentoo* from people who do
> *not help me do Gentoo* but instead only complain and demand.
> 


I can't let this one go.

Michał, Walter is a long-term high-quality Gentoo-user and does not
deserve to be told what you just said above.

Please get your act together and stop treating other people as worthless
nuisances.

You are annoyed by someone or something, that much has been obvious for
a long time now. I can assure you, Walter is not the correct target for
your annoyance. Please deal with the correct source.

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com



  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-24 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-23 19:31 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list Michał Górny
2017-05-23 19:46 ` Rich Freeman
2017-05-23 19:52 ` Philip Webb
2017-05-23 20:07   ` Kent Fredric
2017-05-23 20:03 ` Kent Fredric
2017-05-23 20:32   ` Erik Närström
2017-05-23 21:03     ` Kent Fredric
2017-05-23 21:15       ` Erik Närström
2017-05-24  2:08 ` William Hubbs
2017-05-24  4:17   ` Tuomo Hartikainen
2017-05-24  5:29   ` Ulrich Mueller
2017-05-24  6:36     ` Michał Górny
2017-05-24  5:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " Benda Xu
2017-05-24  6:35   ` Michał Górny
2017-05-24 11:09   ` Kent Fredric
2017-05-24  5:55 ` [gentoo-dev] " Walter Dnes
2017-05-24  6:41   ` Michał Górny
2017-05-24  7:38     ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2017-05-24  7:48     ` Walter Dnes
2017-05-24  9:51       ` Rich Freeman
2017-05-24 15:54         ` Walter Dnes
2017-05-24 16:09           ` Michał Górny
2017-05-24 17:23             ` Rich Freeman
2017-05-24 10:24       ` Michał Górny
2017-05-24 11:39         ` Alan McKinnon [this message]
2017-05-24 12:05           ` Michał Górny
2017-05-24 14:33         ` [gentoo-dev] " Nuno Silva
2017-05-24 15:26           ` Rich Freeman
2017-05-27 16:17         ` [gentoo-dev] " Patrick Lauer
2017-05-29 10:59           ` Alexander Berntsen
2017-05-29 11:36             ` Roy Bamford
2017-05-24 13:01 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2017-05-24 14:13   ` Gregory Woodbury
2017-05-24 13:47 ` Vincent-Xavier JUMEL
2017-05-27  7:48 ` Daniel Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a16842f1-f4c3-8749-5d07-9478ed5b2ad2@gmail.com \
    --to=alan.mckinnon@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox