From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 818BC158041 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 17:03:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CE2AE2A9A; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 17:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1514CE29BB for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 17:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 12:02:59 -0500 From: Ionen Wolkens To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: banning "AI"-backed (LLM/GPT/whatever) contributions to Gentoo Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T2zZb9k/BbpGuuH+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: e83ffbfc-3c81-4eb9-8e71-741d2877bb7a X-Archives-Hash: 6306bc8edc2dafb5f638241277266b94 --T2zZb9k/BbpGuuH+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 03:45:17PM +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to > look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion, > at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely > ban "AI"-backed contribution entirely. In other words, explicitly > forbid people from using ChatGPT, Bard, GitHub Copilot, and so on, to > create ebuilds, code, documentation, messages, bug reports and so on for > use in Gentoo. +1 from me, a clear stance before it really start hitting Gentoo sounds good. --=20 ionen --T2zZb9k/BbpGuuH+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEx3SLh1HBoPy/yLVYskQGsLCsQzQFAmXeFcMACgkQskQGsLCs QzRAgAf9GBVBTKu7oH980wPQ2ko9Qwj6js5ttGwk9JHLpXRRRgzmFR4hLZk+HrXr jy7R7PibObHZTwh6SKzOcni4C5WvUDJsFPo1cTmzDw6asFqEJxOfGgUnbIhR++hX HyIA8bwAxvXqDx575b+KRafTYmbYyZMVIcWDRkZ5S6zkBkv7wTJf+9i/thwtTy/4 xS+T7MU9+qzyDVSV58A9qXHJfbqJEWLJH5iGUY74lWEu2Ftb/Li0GWT2aQ53NzMg gMxHVQCeeBFymgbYCP+yXu+UBWO1Yl8/qb7hAln4iXqTf6Z5CVSaFISZ4snUhMt9 HRKcagl//wlX5RzBt2CXP0/mM6jBMA== =Th6B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T2zZb9k/BbpGuuH+--