From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8BF415815E for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB418E2A5C; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D35AE2A59 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 06:45:35 -0500 From: Ionen Wolkens To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Gentoo Bugzilla: new resolution for bugs closed due to last rites Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <0d9a35f44a050435d17c755b06dbc439956de674.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uzl5h29IVmVh9z2z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0d9a35f44a050435d17c755b06dbc439956de674.camel@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 9f4bdd92-d16c-4b84-9b37-9c0c846eca90 X-Archives-Hash: ce3e0c11e4eb503da47176c63dbaedca --uzl5h29IVmVh9z2z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I think we should add a new bug resolution that would more precisely > cover closing bugs due to packages being removed. Right now, whichever > resolution we use (be it WONTFIX, OBSOLETE, etc.), we aren't able to > easily distinguish whether the resolution was used "normally" or due to > last rites. >=20 > Having a dedicated resolution (technical name RESO/PKGREMOVED) would > make this clear. Furthermore, it would make it easier to reopen bugs > if the packages are ever reintroduced. >=20 > WDYT? Sounds like it could be useful (that or some other way to identify these if preferred), but think something that's missing either way would be a way to automate/streamline it preferably without scripts. Like additional actions for commit summaries (aka like 'Closes:'). In general think not many want to use bugz or do it manually on removal. So these are often not even closed WONTFIX/OBSOLETE but rather as FIXED through 'Closes:' regardless of what the devmanual says (currently it instructs to do WONTFIX). --=20 ionen --uzl5h29IVmVh9z2z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEx3SLh1HBoPy/yLVYskQGsLCsQzQFAmXDbV4ACgkQskQGsLCs QzSlMQf/coUUOEv4x09aBY/V1ojXgqsRSTv8JI96JBGxi/TrHLOdqn3UHt1Kj/Pj jaYWV/jJUfifYLa9s++CwVMsAsKkhZ6qN6k4+N2bX1bSbv8GmNn3Xm0/bCy2BYdJ BbknZC+az2F1DPcP2w82G8idEAhoB2fLLuGb3CV/I3gbTZHZqXXpOz9ENEub8Y47 Y01LKiqGcWxia2JDXxTmkHiBRgGd9KkqH5Hrw7vUBO678lqvwz69/j/nZj6+4D8M SuFI3dRlKEyKFZEwJ6pzasgzH0zCW77dXP/fwvaSmpnMRibdLf01zbUP+dwTndhV TQdXu86JaZBjFqIOiAn7IAOiD+fHsA== =lbMk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uzl5h29IVmVh9z2z--