From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1AED15815E for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 03:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F775E2A57; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 03:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E47E6E2A54 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 03:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 22:33:19 -0500 From: Ionen Wolkens To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Introducing LLVM_TARGET Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <211397b1e89bc0d47a1769102648350a3336f9a5.camel@gentoo.org> <87il328ofr.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C2eXvdpnHrx0jn4/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87il328ofr.fsf@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 2fccadd5-8585-42f8-953c-f532570258a3 X-Archives-Hash: ed3d232c1d1ed5cb04f5cd2be784cd83 --C2eXvdpnHrx0jn4/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 11:44:37PM +0000, Sam James wrote:>=20 > We should mention that https://bugs.gentoo.org/923228 was the motivation > that tipped us over the edge here. >=20 > We should also consider the https://bugs.gentoo.org/880671 / > https://bugs.gentoo.org/821955 case, as I think this is going to end up > solving that too, actually. >=20 > But yeah, I like it. It solves a request we've had from users for a > while ("let me choose") and it solves these silly dep games. *Was* thinking about how it would be unnecessary machinery to implement if we ever give up and switch to a monorepo ebuild, but had slipped my mind that it would properly help that too. For something so major, current || ( ) deps sound subpar either way. So +1, haven't given it much thoughts but idea sounds good to me. Unlike python, doubt I'll be testing all (old) LLVM targets USE on bump and just wait for bug reports though :) --=20 ionen --C2eXvdpnHrx0jn4/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEx3SLh1HBoPy/yLVYskQGsLCsQzQFAmXBqH4ACgkQskQGsLCs QzRctAf/cQuMl9sRAYdRL3hMrf6JlRjWtrmgjyg86neN/jUBiDzhvwn/m+lHIu4n Kycvfzi4YDZFUsF6reqANBjWM3TdS1NxsDRwqJ7qKbW/mUrK9djV7XKzdjZmwujg 2lM+fgA5JrcXm9GBN5SulIGJn99QnkRIpZQlm3u94j1h0DQpvjr0HHaSGpiFdfMB +ErmFZIoma+oK4UGlrlDXk+0ckGFJOTsPZ1Sfa3O8wVKFfrvO354f3HV7ojv3HVH o2maXQGfzfXWQ34maTlsl9hRaOc+7I8Pfpj402B2Om1yeOwb656N1HfKiTIPoWsK os6q/+FvbXvNKbUAAT/ggp2cGCBqJw== =iVHz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C2eXvdpnHrx0jn4/--