From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A331158089 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D08C92BC1D5; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:01:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from msi.no.swordarmor.fr (msi.no.swordarmor.fr [45.91.126.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69DE22BC067 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from irc-clt.no.swordarmor.fr (irc-clt.no.as208627.net [IPv6:2a0e:f42:a::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by msi.no.swordarmor.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8961C38100B for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 13:00:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=swordarmor.fr; s=msi; t=1694516459; bh=YQ5451XAoQnTsnG1urH/YZY09ndaejSHOLY+dfTIxFU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=WkFhsZdxSZ1y0Zfuw9hSRrIDTgfjng3w1LPGSHCnDqA0n1Kyt9S8sS/5cWYmiieJo UjVwpNNyeXpUlFiSou+BiWG12Inki3ZXTeRasD/5hewyHJb1PvEVN+kz0YFIhacUAQ l0YUyUIZX23TMHSc3cnC/R0KzKNzrNvnfF0loQWA= Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 13:00:56 +0200 From: Alarig Le Lay To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev Message-ID: References: <5848191c-8708-edfe-0c69-eeced3907b0d@gmail.com> <87zg1szc23.fsf@gentoo.org> <20230911141451.7c88dd7a@Akita> <87edj4z9q6.fsf@gentoo.org> <20230911143249.704f5d3a@Akita> <87sf7kxtue.fsf@gentoo.org> <20230911151008.77c829ea@Akita> <87edj4xsjr.fsf@gentoo.org> <20230911193424.4f6ef6ad@Akita> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.40 / 15.00]; VIOLATED_DIRECT_SPF(3.50)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(1.00)[-all]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[swordarmor.fr]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:208627, ipnet:2a0e:f42::/32, country:FR] X-Rspamd-Server: msi.no.swordarmor.fr X-Rspamd-Action: greylist X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8961C38100B X-Archives-Salt: ed210379-a475-4e85-857d-847ed83ff7fb X-Archives-Hash: 3e993f28241bd7de75dbfaf596762205 On Tue 12 Sep 2023 05:18:51 GMT, Rich Freeman wrote: > Sorry for this being a bit of a ramble. I do feel for your situation, > but I don't want to see you fighting the wrong battle. Disclaimer: > this is just my outside observation having seen many a treecleaning > frustration in the past. I don't speak for any authority in Gentoo > here. I agree about the wrong battle. For those who want to use it after the treeclean, why don’t you add it to guru (or a personal overlay if it’s not accepted)? -- Alarig