Re: [gentoo-dev] Package stabilization groups

[Oskari Pirhonen <xxc3ncoredxx@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1081 bytes --]

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 19:39:30 +0300, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
> On 17/07/2023 16.50, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 2:04 PM Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> Now I'll speak from the point of implementer of `pkgdev bugs`. For me I
> >> think both approaches are good, but I would prefer the latter over the
> >> former. Nicer syntax, easy cache of all groups, easier to solve the
> >> "graph problems" in the tool.
> > 
> > Sounds good to me. Should we have infra create a new git repo for us
> > for this purpose?
> > 
> 
> No. I think it should go under normal git repo, and not separate repo. I
> see no gains from it being under separate repository, only headache (how
> to sync between them).
> 
> I think a main index files under
> "/metadata/${some_good_name}/${group_name}" would be best.
> 

/metadata/stable-goups/${group_name} perhaps? Then you can adapt Ionen's
example as:

    $ cat /path/to/repo/metadata/stable-groups/qt
    dev-qt/package
    dev-qt/package2

Easy to read, easy to write :)

- Oskari

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]