From: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/4] profiles/use.desc: create USE=strip global USE flag
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 01:25:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHBCv0ZfYD4/gVPt@eversor> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h6rzznlg.fsf@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1851 bytes --]
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 06:06:46AM +0100, Sam James wrote:
>
> Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org> writes:
>
> > Primarily intended for use by linux-mod-r1.eclass, which needs
> > a global IUSE to control stripping of kernel modules *before*
> > signatures and compression (alternative would be to simply never
> > strip, but that seem sub-optimal).
> >
> > Originally meant to be USE=modules-strip or similar, but this can
> > have a more general use case when portage does not know how to
> > strip special files properly while the ebuild does.
> >
> > Notable is mingw ebuilds (wine-*, dxvk, vkd3d-proton, mingw64-*).
> > If portage uses x86_64-pc-linux-strip on, e.g. mingw64-toolchain's
> > runtime libraries, then at least the 32bit toolchain ends up broken
> > and cannot compile anything anymore. But then dostrip -x results in
> > unstripped files while we can use x86_64-w64-mingw32-strip in the
> > ebuild potentially saving 60MB+. Currently this is done through
> > USE=debug, but does not feel fully fitting given this isn't about
> > adding debugging paths (or even symbols, or anything) and is merely
> > "do not strip".
> >
> > No USE in ::gentoo currently contain the word "strip" and defining
> > it should not conflict.
>
> This sounds fine (and a good idea), but we may want some indication
> in the USE flag description (eh), a QA policy to indicate
> it's only for special situations, or some note in the devmanual.
>
> Can see people getting this wrong and trying to use it in ebuilds
> which would work otherwise. But maybe the "special" in the USE
> description is enough?
This is what I had in mind when I used that word. Didn't want the
description to sound like it's aimed at developers more than users,
but still have something that prevents matching common strip usage.
--
ionen
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-26 5:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-26 4:02 [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/4] linux-mod-r1.eclass: new eclass, rewrite of -r0 Ionen Wolkens
2023-05-26 4:02 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/4] profiles/use.desc: create USE=strip global USE flag Ionen Wolkens
2023-05-26 5:06 ` Sam James
2023-05-26 5:25 ` Ionen Wolkens [this message]
2023-05-26 4:02 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/4] profiles/use.desc: create USE=modules-sign " Ionen Wolkens
2023-05-26 4:02 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/4] linux-mod-r1.eclass: new eclass, rewrite of linux-mod.eclass Ionen Wolkens
2023-05-28 12:41 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ionen Wolkens
2023-05-29 13:10 ` Ionen Wolkens
2023-05-26 4:02 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/4] app-admin/ryzen_smu: migrate to linux-mod-r1 Ionen Wolkens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZHBCv0ZfYD4/gVPt@eversor \
--to=ionen@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox