From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGZ8a-0004Pc-1u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 09:37:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8H9Uifo010949; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 09:30:44 GMT Received: from mail-relay-1.tiscali.it (mail-relay-1.tiscali.it [213.205.33.41]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8H9Rmi2016885 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 09:27:48 GMT Received: from default (84.222.80.202) by mail-relay-1.tiscali.it (7.2.063) id 431C63F100128F76 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:33:03 +0200 Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:36:17 +0200 X-Mailer: InScribe Message-ID: References: <432B4549.1070400@gentoo.org> To: From: "Kevin F. Quinn" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] C++ herd proposal Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b8af12db-08d4-4155-9ed4-9611338f5520 X-Archives-Hash: 1eccdce15ddcaa09b5398bd80e3dc9de On 17/9/2005 0:20:57, Mark Loeser (halcy0n@gentoo.org) wrote: C++ herd is a good idea, especially with that number of packages. > I would also like to see many of them, if not all, moved to the dev-cpp > category: Is this bit really necessary? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list