On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 12:39:33AM +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote:
> I'm planning to take ARCH=loongarch for the port; and support the LP64 ABI
> first. I'd like to support both LP64 and ILP32 ABIs, but that's not a
> priority.

> 
> The ABI flag might be named "ABI_LOONGARCH" but that's IMO a bit long (pun
> semi-intended); ARCH=loong and ABI_LOONG might be better, I'm open to
> suggestions.

FWIW, I like loong and ABI_LOONG better, or even better would be to use the
string `uname -m` returns for the hardware as ARCH and as the suffix for
ABI_.

William