[gentoo-dev] Last rites: */* More Py2 only items

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: */* More Py2 only items

[Aaron Bauman]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 878 bytes --]

# Aaron Bauman <bman@gentoo.org> (2020-06-28)
# More Py2 only stuff. Plz see -dev ML for discussions
# Remove bindings, port to Py3, etc
# Removal in 30 days
app-arch/deltarpm
app-crypt/virtualsmartcard
app-text/duali
app-text/mftrace
app-text/queequeg
app-text/referencer
dev-libs/libmacaroons
dev-libs/tut
dev-python/elib-intl
dev-python/eunuchs
dev-python/medusa
dev-python/misaka
dev-python/python-iwscan
dev-util/confix
dev-util/qmtest
dev-util/unrpyc
games-engines/gemrb
media-sound/lilycomp
media-video/tovid
net-dns/maradns
net-irc/irker
net-mail/archivemail
net-mail/getmai
net-nds/nsscache
net-wireless/airpwn
sci-chemistry/bkchem
sci-chemistry/propka
sci-chemistry/pymol-plugins-bni-tools
sci-chemistry/pymol-plugins-emovie
sci-chemistry/viewmol
sci-libs/chemkit
sys-apps/x86info
www-misc/surl
x11-wm/plwm

-- 
Cheers,
Aaron

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */* More Py2 only items

[Aaron Bauman]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 397 bytes --]

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 08:35:02PM -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote:
> # Aaron Bauman <bman@gentoo.org> (2020-06-28)
> # More Py2 only stuff. Plz see -dev ML for discussions
> # Remove bindings, port to Py3, etc
> # Removal in 30 days
> app-arch/deltarpm
> app-crypt/virtualsmartcard
> app-text/duali

<snip>

Add app-text/duali-data which is an rdep of app-text/duali

-- 
Cheers,
Aaron

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */* More Py2 only items

[Alec Warner]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1055 bytes --]

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 5:35 PM Aaron Bauman <bman@gentoo.org> wrote:

> # Aaron Bauman <bman@gentoo.org> (2020-06-28)
> # More Py2 only stuff. Plz see -dev ML for discussions
> # Remove bindings, port to Py3, etc
> # Removal in 30 days
> app-arch/deltarpm
> app-crypt/virtualsmartcard
> app-text/duali
> app-text/mftrace
> app-text/queequeg
> app-text/referencer
> dev-libs/libmacaroons
> dev-libs/tut
> dev-python/elib-intl
> dev-python/eunuchs
> dev-python/medusa
> dev-python/misaka
> dev-python/python-iwscan
> dev-util/confix
> dev-util/qmtest
> dev-util/unrpyc
> games-engines/gemrb
> media-sound/lilycomp
> media-video/tovid
> net-dns/maradns
> net-irc/irker
> net-mail/archivemail
> net-mail/getmai
> net-nds/nsscache
>

Infra uses this, we will have to look into bumping it.

-A


> net-wireless/airpwn
> sci-chemistry/bkchem
> sci-chemistry/propka
> sci-chemistry/pymol-plugins-bni-tools
> sci-chemistry/pymol-plugins-emovie
> sci-chemistry/viewmol
> sci-libs/chemkit
> sys-apps/x86info
> www-misc/surl
> x11-wm/plwm
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Aaron
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1685 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */* More Py2 only items

[Robin H. Johnson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 743 bytes --]

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 07:57:18PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 5:35 PM Aaron Bauman <bman@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > app-crypt/virtualsmartcard
Upstream supposedly fixed it for py3 several years ago, maybe trivial
bump?

> > net-nds/nsscache
> Infra uses this, we will have to look into bumping it.
Bump done.

> > sys-apps/x86info
Also bumped this for trivial python usage, but surprised that upstream
seems to have stopped real maintenance of it with no clear replacement
in sight.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer
E-Mail   : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 1113 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */* More Py2 only items

[Azamat Hackimov]

> dev-python/misaka
I've created MR for it: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/15984


-- 
From Siberia with Love!

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */* More Py2 only items

[Aaron Bauman]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 217 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 09:48:34PM +0300, Azamat Hackimov wrote:
> > dev-python/misaka
> I've created MR for it: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/15984
> 

Azamat, merged! Thank you.

-- 
Cheers,
Aaron

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: */* More Py2 only items

[Piotr Karbowski]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 358 bytes --]

On 29/06/2020 02.35, Aaron Bauman wrote:
> [...]
> net-dns/maradns

There's single python script that can work with Python3 (at least in new
version) that does that can just use any Python version.

I see that it did not got update for over a year, will take it over now and push
update tomorrow, then drop your mask on this package.

-- Piotr.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 618 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: */* More Py2 only items

[Aaron Bauman]

On June 29, 2020 4:57:49 PM EDT, Piotr Karbowski <slashbeast@gentoo.org> wrote:
>On 29/06/2020 02.35, Aaron Bauman wrote:
>> [...]
>> net-dns/maradns
>
>There's single python script that can work with Python3 (at least in
>new
>version) that does that can just use any Python version.
>
>I see that it did not got update for over a year, will take it over now
>and push
>update tomorrow, then drop your mask on this package.
>
>-- Piotr.

Piotr, perfect. Thanks for helping out!

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */* More Py2 only items

[Sam James]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 553 bytes --]


> On 29 Jun 2020, at 01:35, Aaron Bauman <bman@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> # Aaron Bauman <bman@gentoo.org> (2020-06-28)
> # More Py2 only stuff. Plz see -dev ML for discussions
> # Remove bindings, port to Py3, etc
> 
> net-irc/irker
> 

Upstream seem to be about to release 2.19 which includes
several patches for Python 3 compatibility.

(There wasn’t much activity 24 hours ago.. maybe you inspired
something, bman!)

I’ll make a PR with these (either with the patches or release) if
they work fine.

> --
> Cheers,
> Aaron


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 358 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */* More Py2 only items

[Remco Rijnders]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1696 bytes --]

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 08:35:02PM -0400, Aaron wrote in 
<20200629003502.GD17128@bubba>:
># Aaron Bauman <bman@gentoo.org> (2020-06-28)
># More Py2 only stuff. Plz see -dev ML for discussions
># Remove bindings, port to Py3, etc
># Removal in 30 days
>net-mail/getmai

I know this is at the 11th hour, but having been a long time user of
getmail, I would be sad to see this package removed from
gentoo. Reading and enquiring on the getmail user support list, I
learn that the author of getmail is reluctant to make Python 3 support
for this package a priority and won't commit to any immediate efforts
on his part to make this happen.

An effort has been made to port this program to Python 3 by some of
its users, see https://github.com/getmail6/getmail6 . The name
getmail6 has been chosen over the existing name of getmail as to not
hijack the project from its current primary developer and also to
avoid conflicts.

I'd like to volunteer myself as proxy maintainer for this package. As
this would be the first package in gentoo I'd be working on, I ask for
advice on the following two points:

- Can the removal of this package from gentoo be pushed backwards with
a month or so to allow me to work on packaging this new version as
well as do some rudimentary testing to ensure it works properly with
Gentoo? (some success has been reported:
https://github.com/getmail6/getmail6/issues/7#issuecomment-661127141 )

- As upstream for this program would be changed, should the name
getmail in gentoo be kept or would it better to use getmail6, and if
so, what would be the best way to go about this?

Thank you kindly in advance!

Kind regards,

Remmy


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */* More Py2 only items

[Peter Stuge]

Remco Rijnders wrote:
> I'd like to volunteer myself as proxy maintainer for this package. As
> this would be the first package in gentoo I'd be working on, I ask for
> advice on the following two points:

Note that I'm no developer but have been proxy-maint for some time.


> - Can the removal of this package from gentoo be pushed backwards with
> a month or so to allow me to work on packaging this new version as well
> as do some rudimentary testing to ensure it works properly with Gentoo?

I have no idea about this one.


> - As upstream for this program would be changed, should the name
> getmail in gentoo be kept or would it better to use getmail6, and if
> so, what would be the best way to go about this?

Since you want to avoid clobbering the existing name outside of Gentoo
I think you should strive for the same also within Gentoo. That said,
if the two are interchangeable then a virtual/getmail ebuild would
probably be reasonable.


//Peter

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */* More Py2 only items

[Remco Rijnders]

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 02:37:35PM +0000, Peter wrote in 
<20200721143735.5318.qmail@stuge.se>:
>Remco Rijnders wrote:
>> - Can the removal of this package from gentoo be pushed backwards with
>> a month or so to allow me to work on packaging this new version as well
>> as do some rudimentary testing to ensure it works properly with Gentoo?

I'm sorry to see this wasn't possible or missed. A bit later than
expected, I have just submitted a PR to add this package back in, see
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/17239 . I hope it can go in
shortly, but as this is my first PR to Gentoo, I also hope it is of
sufficient quality. Please be gentle ;-)

>> - As upstream for this program would be changed, should the name
>> getmail in gentoo be kept or would it better to use getmail6, and if
>> so, what would be the best way to go about this?
>
>Since you want to avoid clobbering the existing name outside of Gentoo
>I think you should strive for the same also within Gentoo. That said,
>if the two are interchangeable then a virtual/getmail ebuild would
>probably be reasonable.

I have left it at the original name seeing how the old version has now
been removed from Gentoo and this new version is (read: should be)
drop in compatible. I'll happily change this if the consensus is that
this would be better.

Thanks!

Remco