public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Lee <davel@canuck.com>
To: Gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sys-Cleanup after build complete
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 07:25:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.21.0202190704210.7977474-100000@the-gimp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1014004250.5927.6.camel@uranus.u235.eyep.net>

Vitaly Kushneriuk wrote:
> Your problem can be solved with sub-packaging. i.e. producing
> more then one package from the same ebuild. like glibc and glibc-devel.
> This feature is considered for the next generation of portage (after 1.0
> is out).

Is there anybody else out there other than me who doesnt like this?
my experience is with rpm based systems and I hate the proliferation of
-devel packages and other subpackages. thats one thing I really like about 
portage is that I dont have to deal with that, I install a package and it
comes with everything.  I know there are advantages to having -devel and
other subpackages like the rpm systems use, such as finer grained control
of what is and isnt installed, but as a user and administrator I hate
having extra packages installed as though they are different from the
package itself.  most software compiled from source will install the devel
files, and I think portage should too.  maybe a solution is to have a
USE_DEVEL that is used similar to USE, and can be default set to "*" for
everything.  another possibility is to have a --option to emerge so that
emereg doesnt install devel files.  I am new to gentoo so forgive me if
these ideas suck and I will just shutup in that case. 

thanks,
Dave



  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-02-19 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <000601c1b923$f0d57740$be01a8c0@KISSWebMedias>
2002-02-18  3:50 ` [gentoo-dev] Sys-Cleanup after build complete Vitaly Kushneriuk
2002-02-19  9:20   ` AW: " Sebastian Werner
2002-02-18  4:05     ` Vitaly Kushneriuk
2002-02-19 14:25   ` Dave Lee [this message]
2002-02-19 14:00     ` Bob Phan
2002-02-19 18:42       ` George Shapovalov
2002-02-19 15:00     ` Vitaly Kushneriuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.SGI.4.21.0202190704210.7977474-100000@the-gimp \
    --to=davel@canuck.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox