From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JfoLA-0005oP-Fu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 03:36:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8ADC3E0467; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 03:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from coat.coat.com (coat.coat.com [164.153.10.15]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DCEE0467 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 03:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rutrow.coat.com (rutrow.coat.com [192.168.100.80]) by coat.coat.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/bcf03-virt) with ESMTP id m2U3aAth000133 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:36:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:36:10 -0400 (EDT) From: "Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: explicit -r0 in ebuild filename In-Reply-To: <20080330023902.GA8787@seldon.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20080330023902.GA8787@seldon.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Archives-Salt: 31ad7438-cc53-4d32-8d75-f66095298b85 X-Archives-Hash: 505920cc1b66478d8bc9f9034ff939b4 The ebuild howto has been clear on this topic for quite a while: "The fourth subsection of the package name is the Gentoo Linux-specific revision number ({-r#}). This subsection, like the suffix, is also optional. # is a non-zero positive integer; e.g., package-4.5.3-r3" Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- mr_bones_@gentoo.org On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, Brian Harring wrote: > Recently dev-ruby/rubygems-1.1.0-r0 (explicit -r0 in ebuild name) was > commited to mainline gentoo-x86; as far as I know, this is in conflict > w/ long term practice of not explicitly specifying -r0 in the ebuild > name due to the implicit -r0 addition in comparison/atom matching. > At this point, said ebuild is the only one in the tree with an > explicit -r0 also, so I'm advocating having the -r0 dropped. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list