* [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild [not found] <E1If0f8-00081l-81@stork.gentoo.org> @ 2007-10-09 4:21 ` Donnie Berkholz 2007-10-09 12:56 ` Doug Goldstein 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2007-10-09 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev, cardoe On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote: > 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild > > file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup > plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch" > > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch" This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching, particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV directory. > mv -f ${D}/$(get_libdir)/*.a "${D}/usr/$(get_libdir)" > mv -f ${D}/sbin/evmsgui ${D}/usr/sbin Quoting Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild 2007-10-09 4:21 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild Donnie Berkholz @ 2007-10-09 12:56 ` Doug Goldstein 2007-10-11 9:13 ` Tiziano Müller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Doug Goldstein @ 2007-10-09 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw To: Gentoo Dev, dev-zero Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote: >> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild >> >> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup >> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch" >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch" >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch" >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch" >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch" >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch" >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch" >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch" >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch" >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch" >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch" >> >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch" >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch" >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch" >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch" >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch" > > This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching, > particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV > directory. dev-zero? I merely fixed baselayout-2 issues and didn't change any functionality of the ebuild since I don't have an evms setup to test. > >> mv -f ${D}/$(get_libdir)/*.a "${D}/usr/$(get_libdir)" >> mv -f ${D}/sbin/evmsgui ${D}/usr/sbin > > Quoting > > Thanks, > Donnie Your a bit late. I fixed the quoting issues in the ebuild around 8pm EDT along with a few other issues. See the -r9 ebuild. -- Doug Goldstein <cardoe@gentoo.org> http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild 2007-10-09 12:56 ` Doug Goldstein @ 2007-10-11 9:13 ` Tiziano Müller 2007-10-11 9:48 ` Donnie Berkholz 2007-10-11 16:19 ` Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Tiziano Müller @ 2007-10-11 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw To: Doug Goldstein; +Cc: Gentoo Dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1980 bytes --] Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote: > >> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild > >> > >> file : > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r > >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain: > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r > >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain > >> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch" > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch" > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch" > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch" > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch" > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch" > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch" > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch" > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch" > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch" > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch" > >> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch" > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch" > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch" > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch" > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch" > > > > This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching, > > particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV > > directory. > > dev-zero? Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers, while the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want them to be separated. And I don't see any reason to start renaming now. Cheers, Tiziano -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, cpp, Python E-Mail : dev-zero@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30 [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild 2007-10-11 9:13 ` Tiziano Müller @ 2007-10-11 9:48 ` Donnie Berkholz 2007-10-11 16:19 ` Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2007-10-11 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Doug Goldstein On 11:13 Thu 11 Oct , Tiziano Müller wrote: > Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein: > > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote: > > >> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild > > >> > > >> file : > > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r > > >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain: > > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r > > >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain > > >> > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch" > > >> > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch" > > > > > > This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching, > > > particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV > > > directory. > > > > dev-zero? > Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers, while > the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want them to be > separated. > And I don't see any reason to start renaming now. Oh, I would've expected upstream patches to be in SRC_URI ... Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild 2007-10-11 9:13 ` Tiziano Müller 2007-10-11 9:48 ` Donnie Berkholz @ 2007-10-11 16:19 ` Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- @ 2007-10-11 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw To: Gentoo Dev; +Cc: Doug Goldstein [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8; format=flowed, Size: 1983 bytes --] On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Tiziano Müller wrote: > Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein: >> Donnie Berkholz wrote: >>> On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote: >>>> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild >>>> >>>> file : >>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r >>>> 8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain: >>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r >>>> 8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain >>>> >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch" >>>> >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch" >>> >>> This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching, >>> particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV >>> directory. >> >> dev-zero? > Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers, while > the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want them to be > separated. > And I don't see any reason to start renaming now. Still no good reason not to just call epatch once: epatch \ list \ of \ patches \ here Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- mr_bones_@gentoo.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-11 16:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E1If0f8-00081l-81@stork.gentoo.org>
2007-10-09 4:21 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild Donnie Berkholz
2007-10-09 12:56 ` Doug Goldstein
2007-10-11 9:13 ` Tiziano Müller
2007-10-11 9:48 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-10-11 16:19 ` Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox