From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ig0xa-0005xJ-6g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:32:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9BGLnLF008565; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:21:49 GMT Received: from coat.coat.com (coat.coat.com [164.153.10.15]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9BGJg25006058 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:19:42 GMT Received: from rutrow.coat.com (rutrow.coat.com [192.168.100.80]) by coat.coat.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/bcf03-virt) with ESMTP id l9BGJdIM012309; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:19:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:19:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-" To: Gentoo Dev cc: Doug Goldstein Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild In-Reply-To: <200710111113.13732.dev-zero@gentoo.org> Message-ID: References: <20071009042145.GC31103@supernova> <470B7A78.3090805@gentoo.org> <200710111113.13732.dev-zero@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1463791516-691908909-1192119579=:17498" X-Archives-Salt: 37f9d679-bae9-4ad4-ae84-35d2a6a0d6bc X-Archives-Hash: 3c666f531ea242a77c323ae9113f2cf8 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1463791516-691908909-1192119579=:17498 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l9BGLnMv008565 On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Tiziano M=FCller wrote: > Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein: >> Donnie Berkholz wrote: >>> On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote: >>>> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild >>>> >>>> file : >>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5= .5-r >>>> 8.ebuild?rev=3D1.1&view=3Dmarkup plain: >>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5= .5-r >>>> 8.ebuild?rev=3D1.1&content-type=3Dtext/plain >>>> >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch" >>>> >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch" >>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch" >>> >>> This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching= , >>> particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV >>> directory. >> >> dev-zero? > Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers,= while > the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want them= to be > separated. > And I don't see any reason to start renaming now. Still no good reason not to just call epatch once: epatch \ list \ of \ patches \ here Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- mr_bones_@gentoo.org ---1463791516-691908909-1192119579=:17498-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list