On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Tiziano Müller wrote:

> Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein:
>> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>> On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct     , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote:
>>>> 1.1                  sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
>>>>
>>>> file :
>>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r
>>>> 8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain:
>>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r
>>>> 8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
>>>>
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch"
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch"
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch"
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch"
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch"
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch"
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch"
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch"
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch"
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch"
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch"
>>>>
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch"
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch"
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch"
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch"
>>>> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch"
>>>
>>> This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching,
>>> particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV
>>> directory.
>>
>> dev-zero?
> Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers, while
> the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want them to be
> separated.
> And I don't see any reason to start renaming now.

Still no good reason not to just call epatch once:

     epatch \
 	list \
 	of \
 	patches \
 	here

Michael Sterrett
   -Mr. Bones.-
mr_bones_@gentoo.org