From: "Brett I. Holcomb" <brettholcomb@charter.net>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] make.profile symlink now points nowhere (was default-x86-1.4)
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:35:36 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0504082031140.9990@gandalf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <425720B3.4070406@activestate.com>
Question here - I made the link to the 2005.0 profile on (NOT 2005.0/2.4)
a system that is 2.6.11 and has been on 2.6 for months. Tonight emerge
-uD system -p wants to "upgrade" me to a 2.4 kernel!!! Well, portage this
is a 2.6.x system - not 2.4 - duh! From what I found in the mail list
archives and forums noone has really given a solution. Some say "what
problem", others give reasons for it but the fact remains - why on a 2.6
system that has happily been running 2.6 for months does this new profile
want to give me a 2.4 kernel. I did follow one suggest and symlink to
default-linux/x86 directory but I'm afraid that will break something so I
went back to 2004.0 for the symlink. And I am at portage 2.0.51.19 so
that's good.
In short - what do we have to do to upgrade to a current profile on 2.6
machines and get 2.6 gentoo-source updates, not 2.4.
Thanks.
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, David Sparks wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Friday 08 April 2005 07:57 pm, David Sparks wrote:
>>
>>> !!! ARCH is not set... Are you missing the /etc/make.profile symlink?
>>> !!! Is the symlink correct? Is your portage tree complete?
>>
>>
>> so use 'default-x86-2004.2', emerge portage, and then switch to the cascading
>> version
>
> Thanks for the suggestions, I've tried 2004.0 .1 .2 .3 with similar
> results as below.
>
> I also tried coping a binary package into /usr/portage/packages/... and
> emerging it with the -K option but that didn't go either.
>
>
> # rm make.profile
> # ln -s ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2004.2 make.profile
> # emerge portage
>
> !!! Your current profile is deprecated and not supported anymore.
> !!! Please upgrade to the following profile if possible:
> default-linux/x86/2005.0
>
> To upgrade do the following steps:
> # emerge -n '>=sys-apps/portage-2.0.51'
> # cd /etc/
> # rm make.profile
> # ln -s ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0 make.profile
>
> # Gentoo has switched to 2.6 as the defaults for headers/kernels. If
> you wish
> # to use 2.4 headers/kernels, then you should do the following to upgrade:
> # emerge -n '>=sys-apps/portage-2.0.51'
> # cd /etc/
> # rm make.profile
> # ln -s ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/2.4 make.profile
>
> # More information can be found at the following URLs:
> # http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
> # http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/migration-to-2.6.xml
>
>
> !!! 'str' object has no attribute 'insert'
> !!! 'rm -Rf /usr/portage/profiles; emerge sync' may fix this. If it does
> !!! not then please report this to bugs.gentoo.org and, if possible, a dev
> !!! on #gentoo (irc.freenode.org)
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
--
Brett I. Holcomb
brettholcomb@R777charter.net
Registered Linux User #188143
Remove R777 to email
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-09 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-08 23:35 [gentoo-dev] make.profile symlink now points nowhere (was default-x86-1.4) David Sparks
2005-04-08 23:39 ` Francesco Riosa
2005-04-08 23:57 ` David Sparks
2005-04-09 0:02 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-04-09 0:24 ` David Sparks
2005-04-09 0:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-04-09 1:03 ` David Sparks
2005-04-09 0:35 ` Brett I. Holcomb [this message]
2005-04-09 0:41 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-04-09 1:21 ` Brett I. Holcomb
2005-04-09 2:02 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-04-09 3:01 ` Brett I. Holcomb
2005-04-08 23:42 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.62.0504082031140.9990@gandalf \
--to=brettholcomb@charter.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox