From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j38BZLCg017960 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:35:21 GMT Received: from [216.200.97.58] (helo=lacewing.inforead.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DJrld-000302-Dz; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:35:17 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:35:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Ferris McCormick X-X-Sender: fmccor@lacewing.inforead.com To: Mike Frysinger cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.3.5.20050110-r1 for stable In-Reply-To: <200504072346.35199.vapier@gentoo.org> Message-ID: References: <200504072346.35199.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Archives-Salt: 1f92bd27-9f9a-4d49-8066-af6f8c5543f6 X-Archives-Hash: dc2d38f69b51e33371cb3ac22797e9f2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote: > can stable uses of gcc-3.3.5-r1 upgrade to gcc-3.3.5.20050110-r1 and see if > they hit any fun and exciting bugs ? > Uh, there isn't any such thing. If you mean this: Mon Mar 21 14:05:58 2005 >>> sys-devel/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1 it's been stable on sparc for 2.5 weeks. Or did you mean this instead? gcc-3.4.3.20050110-r1 > if not i'd like to move this to stable this weekend > -mike > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > Regards, Ferris - -- Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCVmx6Qa6M3+I///cRAsAoAKDiytqoV6v+6rqTucJVkPTBvgzgrQCfXhM0 QQlUcYo9Ti3z08i8gfwbzqc= =tL0p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list