From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j28NQE0q012162 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 23:26:15 GMT Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net ([204.127.202.56]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1D8o5e-0006jX-FV for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 23:26:14 +0000 Received: from stargazer.weeve.org ([24.8.204.228]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <20050308232614012001rd0ge>; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 23:26:14 +0000 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:26:10 -0700 (MST) From: Jason Wever To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE groups) and negatives In-Reply-To: <20050308224106.46d80d72@snowdrop> Message-ID: References: <20050306162849.247c8c8f@snowdrop> <20050307192415.GA23754@kfk4ever.com> <20050308152117.543b7e36@snowdrop> <20050308173503.GD23754@kfk4ever.com> <20050308224106.46d80d72@snowdrop> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Archives-Salt: df22a1fe-879d-49ec-8427-9978285c1de2 X-Archives-Hash: 313a07b58b0fd90948761f2ef63a5708 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 18:35:03 +0100 Maurice van der Pot > | Can you give an example? > > No, but klieber probably can, since he was the main proponent of not > disallowing negatives. All of these double negatives to express a positive is making me go (more) cross-eyed. :) - -- Jason Wever Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCLjSUdKvgdVioq28RAqhbAKCfP6GaPytFzkkqlxkctUoYlsvwIQCfUvSz U6dY7KPeQ3qWCiX/hO9PfYs= =Yim4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list