From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13512 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2004 23:36:59 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Dec 2004 23:36:59 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1Cbot9-0000zr-NI for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 23:36:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 9949 invoked by uid 89); 7 Dec 2004 23:36:59 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19012 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2004 23:36:59 +0000 Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 23:36:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Ferris McCormick X-X-Sender: fmccor@terciopelo.krait.us To: Georgi Georgiev cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20041207230224.GC9200@lion.gg3.net> Message-ID: References: <1102330135.4362.12.camel@localhost> <20041207225218.GB9200@lion.gg3.net> <20041207230224.GC9200@lion.gg3.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.0-r4 to go ~arch --- ~sparc tests good. X-Archives-Salt: a7bb6f7c-ca79-49d8-bfb1-09157267ea9a X-Archives-Hash: f2bf19f2d5b0f2f2203c1753df39849d -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Georgi Georgiev wrote: > maillog: 08/12/2004-07:52:19(+0900): Georgi Georgiev types >> maillog: 07/12/2004-19:59:05(+0000): Ferris McCormick types >>> 6. NOTE: The two 'is_kernel' tests produce error messages, but (for me, >>> at any rate) ebuild operation is correct anyway. I have not >>> investigated further, but as I recall, the messages were: >>> [: wrong number of arguments (for the check kernel-2.2.x) >>> Command '*' not understood >> >> This is what I had in my overlay while testing the ebuild yesterday. >> The linux-info.eclass kernel_is() should only return an exit code so its >> output should not be looked at. I.e. those "[" and "$(" are not needed. > > Ah, well, linux-info broke in the meantime, that's all. > Thanks for the information. For your confusion, there is a 'kernel_is' in linux-info.eclass, and an 'is_kernel' in x11.eclass. The ebuilds used to use is_kernel; now they use kernel_is, and perhaps the difficulties started with that? Regards, - -- Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) Developer, Gentoo Linux (sparc) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBtj6WQa6M3+I///cRAk6iAKCJYpG+ZXeJr0je3W7Wu8CmdPLK1QCgiy0y /RfYqDogLRPD9rRMSgYcHxw= =6A0o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list