From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6075 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2003 08:04:20 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Dec 2003 08:04:20 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AasNv-0007NA-Ts for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:04:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 26143 invoked by uid 50004); 29 Dec 2003 08:04:18 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 7979 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2003 08:04:17 +0000 Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 03:06:15 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-" To: Mike Frysinger cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200312280415.06042.vapier@gentoo.org> Message-ID: References: <200312271651.16995.caleb@gentoo.org> <200312280415.06042.vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: ebuild inheritance question X-Archives-Salt: de4079a2-ac4e-4862-942d-f0f4a04f44d9 X-Archives-Hash: cf43f79f182bde16fd744af37bdb14a7 On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Mike Frysinger wrote: > the way dependencies work right now with respect to eclasses is pretty > simple ... > > eclasses ALWAYS use newdepend, newrdepend, newpdepend, newcdepend ... they > should NEVER have DEPEND= or similar ... > flip side of the coin is that ebuilds should not be using the newXdepend, they > should be using DEPEND= ... > > i think thats clear enough so i'll leave this alone ;) I don't think this is true. If you look at the existing eclasses you can see a lot of DEPEND= in there. Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- mr_bones_@gentoo.org -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list