public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps
@ 2003-07-25  9:08 Heinrich Wendel
  2003-07-25 11:38 ` Weeve
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Heinrich Wendel @ 2003-07-25  9:08 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-core; +Cc: gentoo-dev

Hi,

I want to mark the following packages stable, but they still need testing on 
non-x86 arches:

ghostscript-7.05.6-r1
cups-1.1.19-r1
foomatic-3.0.0
foomatic-filters-3.0.0
foomatic-db-engine-3.0.03
foomatic-db-20030716
hpijs-1.4.1
hpoj-0.90-r1
lprng-3.8.21
gimp-print-4.3.18

mfg, Heinrich


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps
  2003-07-25  9:08 [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps Heinrich Wendel
@ 2003-07-25 11:38 ` Weeve
  2003-07-25 11:48   ` Heinrich Wendel
  2003-07-25 16:02 ` Brian Jackson
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Weeve @ 2003-07-25 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 460 bytes --]

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 11:08:44 +0200
Heinrich Wendel <lanius@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I want to mark the following packages stable, but they still need testing on 
> non-x86 arches:
> 
(snip)
> cups-1.1.19-r1

Can we hold off on stabilizing this until bug #24759 is resolved?  I don't believe it impairs functionality (other than keeping a good eye on startup scripts at boot time) but cups never used to do this.

Thanks,
-- 
Weeve
Gentoo/Sparc Team Lead

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps
  2003-07-25 11:38 ` Weeve
@ 2003-07-25 11:48   ` Heinrich Wendel
  2003-07-25 12:07     ` Weeve
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Heinrich Wendel @ 2003-07-25 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Am Freitag 25 Juli 2003 13:38 schrieb Weeve:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 11:08:44 +0200
>
> Heinrich Wendel <lanius@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to mark the following packages stable, but they still need testing
> > on non-x86 arches:
>
> (snip)
>
> > cups-1.1.19-r1
>
> Can we hold off on stabilizing this until bug #24759 is resolved?  I don't
> believe it impairs functionality (other than keeping a good eye on startup
> scripts at boot time) but cups never used to do this.

This error seams to appear on a few installations since 1.1.19 and this 
version is already stable :(

>
> Thanks,
mfg, Heinrich


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps
  2003-07-25 11:48   ` Heinrich Wendel
@ 2003-07-25 12:07     ` Weeve
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Weeve @ 2003-07-25 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 280 bytes --]

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:48:11 +0200
Heinrich Wendel <lanius@gentoo.org> wrote:

> This error seams to appear on a few installations since 1.1.19 and this 
> version is already stable :(

D'oh, I had only used 1.1.19-r1, so wasn't aware on 1.1.19.

-- 
Weeve
Gentoo/Sparc Team Lead

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps
  2003-07-25  9:08 [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps Heinrich Wendel
  2003-07-25 11:38 ` Weeve
@ 2003-07-25 16:02 ` Brian Jackson
  2003-07-27 15:39 ` Ferris McCormick
  2003-07-28 15:29 ` [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps (tetex-2.0.2) Ferris McCormick
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Brian Jackson @ 2003-07-25 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Friday 25 July 2003 04:08 am, Heinrich Wendel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to mark the following packages stable, but they still need testing
> on non-x86 arches:
>
> ghostscript-7.05.6-r1
> cups-1.1.19-r1
> foomatic-3.0.0
> foomatic-filters-3.0.0
> foomatic-db-engine-3.0.03
> foomatic-db-20030716
> hpijs-1.4.1
> hpoj-0.90-r1
> lprng-3.8.21
> gimp-print-4.3.18

fwiw, I use most of these on 2 boxes at work, and 1 box at home. Haven't seen 
any problems yet.

--Brian Jackson (iggy)

>
> mfg, Heinrich
>
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
OpenGFS -- http://opengfs.sourceforge.net
Home -- http://www.brianandsara.net


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps
  2003-07-25  9:08 [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps Heinrich Wendel
  2003-07-25 11:38 ` Weeve
  2003-07-25 16:02 ` Brian Jackson
@ 2003-07-27 15:39 ` Ferris McCormick
  2003-07-28 15:29 ` [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps (tetex-2.0.2) Ferris McCormick
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ferris McCormick @ 2003-07-27 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Heinrich Wendel; +Cc: gentoo-dev, gentoo-sparc

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Heinrich Wendel wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I want to mark the following packages stable, but they still need testing on 
> non-x86 arches:
>

On sparc for me concerning ghostscript & lprng:
 
> ghostscript-7.05.6-r1

ghostscript-7.05.6-r2 seems OK; I can't speak to '-r1'

> cups-1.1.19-r1
> foomatic-3.0.0
> foomatic-filters-3.0.0
> foomatic-db-engine-3.0.03
> foomatic-db-20030716
> hpijs-1.4.1
> hpoj-0.90-r1

> lprng-3.8.21

Builds fine, and the utilities 'lpr' 'lpq' 'lpc' seem OK.  However,
1.  Permissions on /var/spool/lpd as installed are such that no user may
    queue anything;
2.  Once that is corrected, lpd won't print for me; my printcap in 
    relevant part reads:

===========================
.common:
   :sd=/var/spool/lpd/%P
   :sh:mx=0:mc=0

lp|hp:tc=.common:lp=192.168.1.4%9100 \
        :filter=/usr/local/libexec/filters/ifhp
        :ifhp=model=hp4simx
============================
The test is pretty simple:
  1.  Fix printcap to be as above;
  2.  cd /etc/init.d
  3.  ./LPRng stop                     ### Stop locally grown daemon
  4.  ./lprng start                    ### And start up the new one
  5.  lpc (to make sure everything is up & enabled & started & whatever 
      else)
  6.  a2ps -o lprng.ps lprng
  7.  lpr -B lprng.ps
And watch:  First, "no permissions" with /var/spool/lpd/lp
And then, lpstat -> "No server enabled"

This works fine with locally built lprng-3.8.10, and it seems to be
a problem with the configuration as build for 3.8.21.  Putting
force_localhost@
(or default force_localhost@) in the "/etc/lprng/lpd.conf" file does not
cure anything.

Since my locally built lprng-3.8.10 works fine on any system I have put it
on, I am just going to say that lprng-3.8.21 might be OK, but it certainly
doesn't work "out of the box."  If anyone will tell how to fix the 
configuration problem, I'll give 3.8.21 a workout, since I do a lot on 
network printing (on the printer described above) anyway.

(By the way, I could not use lprng at all without the 'ifhp' filter; have
you ever considered adding it to GenToo?)

> gimp-print-4.3.18
> 
> mfg, Heinrich
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@inforead.com>
Phone: (703) 392-0303
Fax:   (703) 392-0401


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps (tetex-2.0.2)
  2003-07-25  9:08 [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps Heinrich Wendel
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-27 15:39 ` Ferris McCormick
@ 2003-07-28 15:29 ` Ferris McCormick
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ferris McCormick @ 2003-07-28 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Heinrich Wendel; +Cc: gentoo-sparc, gentoo-dev

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Heinrich Wendel wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I want to mark the following packages stable, but they still need testing on 
> non-x86 arches:

Maybe you're not the one who cares about this one, but I'll pass it to
you anyway.  (And feel free to ignore if it's not something you care 
about.)

Some time ago --- about 6 months or so --- there was a discussion about
upgrading to tetex-2.xxx.  In the process of bringing a couple systems
on line, I noticed that tetex-2.0.2 is still keyword '~sparc'.

However, it installs and seems to run fine on sparc, and in fact I have
been using it with no problems ever since some initial shakedown with
the original tetex-2.x candidate.

So, I'll offer tetex-2.0.2 as a candidate for marking stable/sparc.
I can file this as a bug report if anyone likes, but please let me know
if that is what you prefer.

Regards,
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@inforead.com>
Phone: (703) 392-0303
Fax:   (703) 392-0401


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-28 15:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-25  9:08 [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps Heinrich Wendel
2003-07-25 11:38 ` Weeve
2003-07-25 11:48   ` Heinrich Wendel
2003-07-25 12:07     ` Weeve
2003-07-25 16:02 ` Brian Jackson
2003-07-27 15:39 ` Ferris McCormick
2003-07-28 15:29 ` [gentoo-dev] Testing required for stable bumps (tetex-2.0.2) Ferris McCormick

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox