From: "A. Craig West" <acwest-gentoo-dev@craigwest.net>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ?
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 23:21:37 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0308232314010.8952@gizmo.bdkw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200308232306.55513.luke-jr@gentoo.org>
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Luke-Jr wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> What about PPPoE? I don't think that hurts people who don't use it either?
> Maybe include some basic dialup tools at the same time?
> IMO, stuff in system should be what is actually required... If it included
> things that were common for a particular installation, then there would
> likely be more than just default-*, and if I'm wrong about what system should
> be for, let me know because it would mean I should probably be using a new
> profile for InGen instead of making a custom automated etc-update to protect
> InGen's make.conf...
You bring up too good points. What, exactly, is the definition of system? If
it is 'everything you need to have a network connected box, so you can go
get anything else you need" then I DO think PPPoE should be in it, and maybe
ppp or whatever is current in the way of dial-up. They are both quite
equivalent to dhcpcd, and neither is all that big, I don't think. The real
question is, what is System?
--
Craig West Ph: (416) 666-1645 | It's not a bug,
acwest-sig@craigwest.net | It's a feature...
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-24 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-23 19:04 [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ? Marius Mauch
2003-08-23 19:20 ` Wolfram Schlich
2003-08-23 20:23 ` Daniel Armyr
2003-08-23 21:20 ` Wolfram Schlich
2003-08-24 6:08 ` Daniel Armyr
2003-08-23 23:06 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-24 3:21 ` A. Craig West [this message]
2003-08-24 8:59 ` Spider
2003-08-24 16:32 ` Alec Berryman
2003-08-24 16:44 ` Spider
2003-08-24 18:16 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-08-24 18:40 ` Alec Berryman
2003-08-24 18:55 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-24 18:47 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-08-24 19:05 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-24 19:03 ` Marius Mauch
2003-08-25 0:44 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-25 0:48 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-24 22:00 ` Grant Goodyear
2003-08-25 3:07 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-23 19:29 ` Stewart Honsberger
2003-08-23 20:29 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-08-24 7:22 ` Stewart Honsberger
2003-08-24 8:33 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-08-24 15:09 ` Brad Laue
2003-08-24 20:41 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-08-23 21:25 ` Norberto BENSA
2003-08-23 20:34 ` Yuri Enshin
2003-08-23 21:27 ` Norberto BENSA
2003-08-23 23:16 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-24 8:15 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-08-25 2:18 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-25 4:24 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-08-25 4:46 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-08-25 13:46 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-25 16:27 ` William Hubbs
2003-08-23 23:08 ` Lloyd D Budd
2003-08-24 4:28 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-24 14:14 ` Marius Mauch
2003-08-24 14:33 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-08-24 15:09 ` Paul de Vrieze
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-24 20:40 Spider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.53.0308232314010.8952@gizmo.bdkw \
--to=acwest-gentoo-dev@craigwest.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox