From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19133 invoked by uid 1002); 2 Jul 2003 19:00:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 5441 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2003 19:00:39 -0000 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:00:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Weeve X-X-Sender: gen-email@stargazer.weeve.org To: Paul de Vrieze cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200307022034.40019.pauldv@gentoo.org> Message-ID: References: <200307021536.18639.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200307022020.26030.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200307022034.40019.pauldv@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] ANNOUNCEMENT: metadata.xml files can be created X-Archives-Salt: 05ac01aa-8b9a-4bf0-87e6-dbbf9f4e3a14 X-Archives-Hash: 4a81cd8b4c27ca9a9e63c4cdcf12c485 On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > On Wednesday 02 July 2003 20:26, Weeve wrote: > > > > OK cool. Now for the next question. If I add a metadata.xml file to a > > package I maintain, leaving the herd as no-herd (using skel.metadata.xml > > as a template), does this cause anything to break? > > It currently does not break anything, but it is not supposed to contain > no-herd. I think though that it containing no-herd is better than it > containing an empty tag. Basically the herd needs to be assigned. So what we need(ed) to do first is/was come up with the herds before we start asking package maintainers to add metadata.xml files to their packages? -- Weeve Gentoo/Sparc Team Lead -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list