From: wes chow <wes@woahnelly.net>
To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
Cc: "Aurélien Gouny" <aurelien@gouny.org>,
"gentoo-dev@gentoo.org" <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>,
gentoo-user <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:37 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.50L0.0212170923400.7932-100000@hitchcock.woahnelly.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00b601c2a5d7$c9394300$c00c460a@pro.tl.thomcorp.net>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN, Size: 1758 bytes --]
I just rsynced and portage -r6 is masked. I also noticed the hdparm
downgrade, though. Does anybody know why this is? The ChangeLog entry is
the same as the ChangeLog entry for portage -r6.
Wes
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> Well, I just rsynced and it is still there!
>
> root@fuggle root # emerge -pu world
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
>
> Calculating world dependencies ...done!
> [ebuild U ] sys-apps/portage-2.0.45-r6 [2.0.45-r5]
> *** Portage will stop merging at this point and reload itself,
> recalculate dependancies, and complete the merge.
>
> [ebuild U ] app-admin/sysklogd-1.4.1-r3 [1.4.1-r2]
> [ebuild UD] sys-apps/hdparm-5.2-r3 [5.3-r1]
> [ebuild U ] net-misc/ntp-4.1.1b-r1 [4.1.1b-r0]
>
>
> Tom Veldhouse
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Aurélien Gouny" <aurelien@gouny.org>
> To: <veldy@veldy.net>
> Cc: <kdolkas@telecom.ntua.gr>; <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; <manson@gentoo.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 7:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
>
>
> >
> > Thomas T. Veldhouse said:
> > > Rodney,
> > >
> > > Please remask this (portage-2.0.45-r6) ASAP.
> > >
> > > Tom Veldhouse
> > >
> >
> > I'm not Rodney but I've made a 'emerge rsync' and there is no portage to
> > be updated, it seems to have been masked.
> >
> > Thanks guys for warning,
> > --
> > Aurélien Gouny
> > ______________________________
> > Email: aurelien@gouny.org
> > Web: http://aurelien.gouny.org
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-17 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-17 13:18 [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
2002-12-17 13:41 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 13:41 ` Jaeggi, Daniel M.
2002-12-17 13:56 ` konstantinos Dolkas
2002-12-17 13:49 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 13:53 ` Aurélien Gouny
2002-12-17 14:09 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 14:55 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 16:10 ` Daniel Robbins
2002-12-17 16:15 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 18:17 ` Henti Smith
2002-12-17 16:15 ` Adam Voigt
2002-12-17 18:35 ` Henti Smith
2002-12-17 16:20 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 22:42 ` Aurelien Gouny
2002-12-17 16:26 ` Riyad Kalla
2002-12-17 14:22 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 14:27 ` wes chow [this message]
2002-12-17 14:30 ` Georgios Kylafas
2002-12-17 14:38 ` [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY messed " Pat Double
2002-12-17 14:59 ` konstantinos Dolkas
2002-12-17 14:57 ` Pat Double
2002-12-17 15:13 ` konstantinos Dolkas
2002-12-17 15:09 ` Georgios Kylafas
[not found] ` <200212171612.08365.icemaze@tiscalinet.it>
2002-12-17 15:23 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Quick and dirty system rescue (was: portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?) Georgios Kylafas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-17 19:40 [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? Sean P. Kane
2002-12-18 9:28 ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.50L0.0212170923400.7932-100000@hitchcock.woahnelly.net \
--to=wes@woahnelly.net \
--cc=aurelien@gouny.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@gentoo.org \
--cc=veldy@veldy.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox