public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wes chow <wes@woahnelly.net>
To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
Cc: "Aurélien Gouny" <aurelien@gouny.org>,
	"gentoo-dev@gentoo.org" <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>,
	gentoo-user <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:37 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.50L0.0212170923400.7932-100000@hitchcock.woahnelly.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00b601c2a5d7$c9394300$c00c460a@pro.tl.thomcorp.net>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN, Size: 1758 bytes --]



I just rsynced and portage -r6 is masked.  I also noticed the hdparm 
downgrade, though.  Does anybody know why this is?  The ChangeLog entry is 
the same as the ChangeLog entry for portage -r6.


Wes


On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:

> Well, I just rsynced and it is still there!
> 
> root@fuggle root # emerge -pu world
> 
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
> 
> Calculating world dependencies ...done!
> [ebuild    U ] sys-apps/portage-2.0.45-r6 [2.0.45-r5]
> *** Portage will stop merging at this point and reload itself,
>     recalculate dependancies, and complete the merge.
> 
> [ebuild    U ] app-admin/sysklogd-1.4.1-r3 [1.4.1-r2]
> [ebuild    UD] sys-apps/hdparm-5.2-r3 [5.3-r1]
> [ebuild    U ] net-misc/ntp-4.1.1b-r1 [4.1.1b-r0]
> 
> 
> Tom Veldhouse
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Aurélien Gouny" <aurelien@gouny.org>
> To: <veldy@veldy.net>
> Cc: <kdolkas@telecom.ntua.gr>; <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; <manson@gentoo.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 7:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
> 
> 
> >
> > Thomas T. Veldhouse said:
> > > Rodney,
> > >
> > > Please remask this (portage-2.0.45-r6) ASAP.
> > >
> > > Tom Veldhouse
> > >
> >
> > I'm not Rodney but I've made a 'emerge rsync' and there is no portage to
> > be updated, it seems to have been masked.
> >
> > Thanks guys for warning,
> > --
> > Aurélien Gouny
> > ______________________________
> > Email: aurelien@gouny.org
> > Web: http://aurelien.gouny.org
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
> 

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-17 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-17 13:18 [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
2002-12-17 13:41 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 13:41 ` Jaeggi, Daniel M.
2002-12-17 13:56 ` konstantinos Dolkas
2002-12-17 13:49   ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 13:53     ` Aurélien Gouny
2002-12-17 14:09       ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 14:55         ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 16:10           ` Daniel Robbins
2002-12-17 16:15             ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 18:17             ` Henti Smith
2002-12-17 16:15               ` Adam Voigt
2002-12-17 18:35                 ` Henti Smith
2002-12-17 16:20               ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 22:42                 ` Aurelien Gouny
2002-12-17 16:26               ` Riyad Kalla
2002-12-17 14:22       ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 14:27         ` wes chow [this message]
2002-12-17 14:30       ` Georgios Kylafas
2002-12-17 14:38         ` [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY messed " Pat Double
2002-12-17 14:59           ` konstantinos Dolkas
2002-12-17 14:57             ` Pat Double
2002-12-17 15:13               ` konstantinos Dolkas
2002-12-17 15:09             ` Georgios Kylafas
     [not found]         ` <200212171612.08365.icemaze@tiscalinet.it>
2002-12-17 15:23           ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Quick and dirty system rescue (was: portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?) Georgios Kylafas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-17 19:40 [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? Sean P. Kane
2002-12-18  9:28 ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.50L0.0212170923400.7932-100000@hitchcock.woahnelly.net \
    --to=wes@woahnelly.net \
    --cc=aurelien@gouny.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-user@gentoo.org \
    --cc=veldy@veldy.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox