* [gentoo-dev] x11-base/xfree should be virtual/x11
@ 2003-08-28 19:05 Jasmin Buchert
2003-08-28 19:23 ` Spider
2003-08-28 19:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jasmin Buchert @ 2003-08-28 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Hi,
I submitted a bugreport today saying that all x11-base/xfree DEPEND's
should be virtual/x11. But my bugzilla bugreport (Bug #27479) was reject
with the reason: "open up bugs for specific packages" -> INVALID.
What now? Should I make a script that greps for packages with
x11-base/xfree and let it make automatic bugzilla bug requests? ;)
Greetings,
Jasmin
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] x11-base/xfree should be virtual/x11
2003-08-28 19:05 [gentoo-dev] x11-base/xfree should be virtual/x11 Jasmin Buchert
@ 2003-08-28 19:23 ` Spider
2003-08-28 19:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Spider @ 2003-08-28 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 918 bytes --]
begin quote
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:05:24 +0200
Jasmin Buchert <jasmin@atlantica.ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I submitted a bugreport today saying that all x11-base/xfree DEPEND's
> should be virtual/x11. But my bugzilla bugreport (Bug #27479) was
> reject with the reason: "open up bugs for specific packages" ->
> INVALID. What now? Should I make a script that greps for packages with
> x11-base/xfree and let it make automatic bugzilla bug requests? ;)
>
Be more specific. virtual/x11 may provide xlib, but may not provide
extentions such as XRENDER and other "necessary" things for a modern
desktop. This is something that makes a package-by-package decision
necessary.
I agree that the bugresolver could have been more verbose, but its
generally correct.
//Spider
--
begin .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: x11-base/xfree should be virtual/x11
2003-08-28 19:05 [gentoo-dev] x11-base/xfree should be virtual/x11 Jasmin Buchert
2003-08-28 19:23 ` Spider
@ 2003-08-28 19:29 ` Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- @ 2003-08-28 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Jasmin Buchert; +Cc: gentoo-dev
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Jasmin Buchert wrote:
> I submitted a bugreport today saying that all x11-base/xfree DEPEND's
> should be virtual/x11. But my bugzilla bugreport (Bug #27479) was reject
> with the reason: "open up bugs for specific packages" -> INVALID.
> What now? Should I make a script that greps for packages with
> x11-base/xfree and let it make automatic bugzilla bug requests? ;)
Yes. ;-)
I would think that one bug report per category would be enough granularity
though, i.e. app-editors, app-emulation, app-games...
I only see 117 individual packages that have this string in them and only
35 categories, so...35 bugs I supppose.
Michael Sterrett
-Mr. Bones.-
msterret@gentoo.org
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-28 19:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-28 19:05 [gentoo-dev] x11-base/xfree should be virtual/x11 Jasmin Buchert
2003-08-28 19:23 ` Spider
2003-08-28 19:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox