From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mail.iitk.ac.in (unknown [203.200.95.130]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E918AC487 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 15:00:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from antivirus.cc.iitk.ac.in (antivirus.cc.iitk.ac.in [172.31.1.102]) by mail.iitk.ac.in (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA02395 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 01:30:32 +0530 (IST) Received: from thunderbird.junta.iitk.ac.in ([172.31.77.197]) by antivirus.cc.iitk.ac.in (NAVGW 2.5.2.9) with SMTP id M2002061901570804741 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 01:57:08 +0530 Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 01:43:46 +0530 (IST) From: Prashanth Aditya Susarla X-X-Sender: aditya@thunderbird.junta.iitk.ac.in To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposition for stage3. In-Reply-To: <20020618154800.41276e24.rufiao@gmx.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 29a20553-73fb-40b0-9061-b3bf2c60018c X-Archives-Hash: 50706e4b55ab84d0d7298d0db5516596 If you use gcc-2.95 then this doesn't break anything. With gcc-3.x however, glibc and X break with -fomit-frame-pointer. These are the two major packages which need to be built without this flag. About others, I don't know as I haven't come across any yet. In fact, I've used my regular flags (-march=athlon-tbird -mmnx -m3dnow -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer) on qt also (by editing the correspoding qmake.conf) with gcc-3.1 and there are no problems. Regards, Prashanth Aditya Susarla On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Rufiao wrote: > > I haven't build a whole system using that yet. Any packages break > specifically because of this flag? > > Per Wigren [Tue 18-Jun-2002 18:41 GMT+0200]: > > -fomit-frame-pointer often gives a noticable speedup also... > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev >