From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48, DMARC_MISSING,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mail.iitk.ac.in (unknown [203.200.95.130]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B00FAC416 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 14:37:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from antivirus.cc.iitk.ac.in (antivirus.cc.iitk.ac.in [172.31.1.102]) by mail.iitk.ac.in (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA18580 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:07:56 +0530 (IST) Received: (from thunderbird [172.31.77.197]) by antivirus.cc.iitk.ac.in (NAVGW 2.5.2.9) with SMTP id M2002060501344331269 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 01:34:43 +0530 Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 00:12:47 +0530 (IST) From: Prashanth Aditya Susarla X-X-Sender: aditya@thunderbird.junta.iitk.ac.in To: "'gentoo-dev@gentoo.org'" Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC3.1 bootstrap fails In-Reply-To: <4957DDB96FE2D411A5C10008C7A4A126035FE242@dfsmttayz083.hq.af.mil> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: b51fb065-2080-4ba0-b417-34117c954e9c X-Archives-Hash: 5df611b99b0dec0e10a0cf499dc160f5 There seems to be a tangible gain in performance. I've also employed Casey's tips to improved KDE performance and it's all paying off. At this moment, I have yet to merge kdemultimedia and kdeaddons which at the moment cannot be merged because of the xanim problem. KDE otherwise seems to be working fine. Konqueror, kcontrol... the works. They are all doing fine. At this moment, bitchx is segfaulting and irssi won't emerge. BitchX segfaults and I think this has got to do something with the compiler/flags. Will look at it with slightly less aggressive flags. Regards, Prashanth Aditya Susarla On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Zaborowski, Ed, Ctr, AFPCA/OAC wrote: > I don't believe you should _have_ to recompile your kde packages (I could be > wrong), but I would think it would seem reasonable that you should get a > performance gain recompiling those with the -march=athlon-tbird > -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 flags.