public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC3.1 bootstrap fails
@ 2002-06-04 17:13 Zaborowski, Ed, Ctr, AFPCA/OAC
  2002-06-03 16:57 ` Prashanth Aditya Susarla
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Zaborowski, Ed, Ctr, AFPCA/OAC @ 2002-06-04 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: 'gentoo-dev@gentoo.org'

I myself, am in the middle of compiling kdelibs, and will let you know how
kdemultimedia goes shortly. 

The flags I used for boot-strap were -march=athlon-tbird -O3
Everything else has been compiled using -march=athlon=tbird
-fomit-frame-pointer -O3 (I had to ebuild parts of Xfree manually so I could
change the flags in certain areas to get it to compile, and I also had to
modify and ebuild manually qt because, the I had to add those flags
specifically to qt's qmake.conf. It apparently doesn't honor the settings in
make.conf)



-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Kennedy [mailto:mkennedy@gentoo.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:12 PM
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC3.1 bootstrap fails

Prashanth Aditya Susarla <aditya@iitk.ac.in> writes:

> I have yet to compile  qt and kde and going by what I've seen about these 
> builds vis-a-vis gcc 3.1 I just might have to go easy again on the 
> optimization flags a bit (like I did for xfree).

I'd be very interested to hear how compiling KDE (kdemultimedia in
particular) goes for you with those flags.

Thanks

-- 
Matthew Kennedy
Gentoo Linux Developer
Bugs go in http://bugs.gentoo.org!

_______________________________________________
gentoo-dev mailing list
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC3.1 bootstrap fails
@ 2002-06-04 19:07 Zaborowski, Ed, Ctr, AFPCA/OAC
  2002-06-03 18:42 ` Prashanth Aditya Susarla
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Zaborowski, Ed, Ctr, AFPCA/OAC @ 2002-06-04 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: 'gentoo-dev@gentoo.org'

I don't believe you should _have_ to recompile your kde packages (I could be
wrong), but I would think it would seem reasonable that you should get a
performance gain recompiling those with the -march=athlon-tbird
-fomit-frame-pointer -O3 flags.

-----Original Message-----
From: Prashanth Aditya Susarla [mailto:aditya@iitk.ac.in] 
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:57 PM
To: 'gentoo-dev@gentoo.org'
Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC3.1 bootstrap fails

> -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 (I had to ebuild parts of Xfree manually so I
could
> change the flags in certain areas to get it to compile, and I also had to

Somehow I couldn't manage to do this. There was this problem with one 
particular component (don't remember which, it was posted in one thread on 
this mailing list earlier this month) and there was a quickfix solution 
to it which said that it could be built manually in $PORTAGE_TMPDIR. I 
tried it with all combinations of flags but I couldn't get it to work. 
Ultimately I had to rebuild entire xfree with -march=i686 -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe.

I had almost forgotten that qt doesn't honor make.conf and I went ahead 
and built it and to my consternation saw it was using measly -O2 (and no 
architecture-specific) flags. I think I'll just rebuild qt after I am done 
with kde entirely.

Will it be necessary for me to recompile KDE if I recompile qt with these 
newer flags? I shouldn't think so because I don't see any 
qt-statically-linked components in KDE.

Regards,
Prashanth Aditya Susarla


_______________________________________________
gentoo-dev mailing list
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20020602170104.750B0AC465@chiba.3jane.net>]

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-05  5:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-06-04 17:13 [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC3.1 bootstrap fails Zaborowski, Ed, Ctr, AFPCA/OAC
2002-06-03 16:57 ` Prashanth Aditya Susarla
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-04 19:07 Zaborowski, Ed, Ctr, AFPCA/OAC
2002-06-03 18:42 ` Prashanth Aditya Susarla
     [not found] <20020602170104.750B0AC465@chiba.3jane.net>
2002-06-02 17:42 ` Prashanth Aditya Susarla
2002-06-02 21:32   ` Bart Verwilst
2002-06-03  0:53     ` Prashanth Aditya Susarla
2002-06-03  1:18     ` Prashanth Aditya Susarla
2002-06-03  2:07       ` Prashanth Aditya Susarla
2002-06-03  3:52     ` Brian Webb
2002-06-03  6:04       ` Brian Webb
2002-06-03  5:59         ` Prashanth Aditya Susarla
2002-06-04 17:12           ` Matthew Kennedy
2002-06-03 16:49             ` Prashanth Aditya Susarla
2002-06-05  5:51               ` Christian Hergl
2002-06-04  6:05                 ` Prashanth Aditya Susarla

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox