From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mail.iitk.ac.in (unknown [203.200.95.130]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D1CAC5B0 for ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 19:54:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from antivirus.cc.iitk.ac.in (antivirus.cc.iitk.ac.in [172.31.1.102]) by mail.iitk.ac.in (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id GAA18110 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 06:25:08 +0530 (IST) Received: (from bhaskar [172.31.1.7]) by antivirus.cc.iitk.ac.in (NAVGW 2.5.2.9) with SMTP id M2002060306515809120 for ; Mon, 03 Jun 2002 06:51:58 +0530 Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 06:23:36 +0530 (IST) From: Prashanth Aditya Susarla X-Sender: aditya@bhaskar.cc.iitk.ac.in To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC3.1 bootstrap fails In-Reply-To: <200206022332.09275.verwilst@gentoo.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 91b9af66-87db-435b-b4b0-cf9fab847cfa X-Archives-Hash: 4ba65fccc204c1d485449fccc7c67be1 Great work. I'll definitely try it out. Can I use the -march=athlon-tbird flag at the outset with this build image? I guess I can. About some more developments - I followed Spider's "recipe" (as he calls it :-)) to build a gcc-3.1 system and I must say it works great. I stored away the safe packages and then changed the optmizations a bit. The system always complains whenever glibc is compiled with -fomit-frame-pointer. I kept the other flags intact and just removed this, and again everything is perfect. I think this new gcc-3.1 tarball had to come out... Regards, Prashanth On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Bart Verwilst wrote: >Would be cool if you could try and bootstrap again with -fomit-frame-pointer, >and now use the 1.3-gcc3.1 tarball from ibiblio >(http://www.ibiblio.org/gentoo/releases/build/) i just made. If it fails, i >guess we should filter out most of the optimisations... I think the new >gcc3.1-compiled tarball will make all the gcc3.1-users much happier :o) >I also updated the packages file from the gcc 3.1 profile, and the >make.defaults. Please keep us posted on any progress! > >Thanks!