From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,DMARC_QUAR,
	INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from pony-express.cs.rit.edu ([129.21.30.24])
	by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1)
	id 15bSc6-0006Ik-00
	for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:04:03 -0600
Received: from hawaii (hawaii [129.21.37.181])
	by pony-express.cs.rit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA04770
	for <gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:04:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Derek J. Belrose" <djb5891@cs.rit.edu>
To: <gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0108271603380.746-100000@hawaii.cs.rit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: [gentoo-dev] LHS
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list <gentoo-dev.cvs.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
Date: Mon Aug 27 14:05:02 2001
X-Original-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:04:07 -0400 (EDT)
X-Archives-Salt: 40427aca-18e7-45c0-8ec1-160be1b746fc
X-Archives-Hash: 59732f0c66c32be2583b5c727740e45c

How well does Gentoo hold up against the LHS?  If it doesn't, is that a
plan for the future?

Derek Belrose