From: "Todd Wright" <wylie@geekasylum.org>
To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] !!!Really worried about ebuild updates!
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 22:13:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <NCEBJBHELIGGHDDGAEGNIELGDJAA.wylie@geekasylum.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1019443049.4859.9.camel@gentoo.shacknet.nu>
Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> Personally, I find it helpful if a user sends in a patch or updated
> ebuild (preferably a patch though) for the latest version, rather than
> just a "this is out-dated" message in bugzilla.
Ive sent in a couple of updated ebuilds. So far Ive been sending the complete thing. If a patch is preferred I can switch to sending patches, but as you said, its personal preference of the developer handling the 'bug'. Given that the bugs are assigned to different developers I have no way of knowing if the developer who gets my bug prefers diffs or complete new updated ebuild files.
Is there a consensus on what format is prefered by most developers?
In addition, I have always marked my updated ebuilds with a comment stating that I updated it, with my email address and the new revision (-rx) that I updated. (in the header, below the Author/Maintainer line). Is this correct, or should I not include that ?
Ive stumbled on a couple of ebuilds that need revising, not due to later versions of the software, but rather due to compile / install bugs or 'gotchya's etc. Im quite happy to submit them when I fix them. I also have a few more new package ebuilds in the works.
-- _--_|\ --------- Todd Wright -- wylie@geekasylum.org --------
/ \
\_.--._* <--- http://www.dreams.darker.net/~wylie/
v Mobile: +61-403-796-001 Ph: +61-2-9521-8677
----------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-22 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-21 23:51 [gentoo-dev] !!!Really worried about ebuild updates! al3x payne
2002-04-22 2:37 ` Matthew Kennedy
2002-04-22 12:13 ` Todd Wright [this message]
2002-04-23 6:34 ` Matthew Kennedy
2002-04-23 14:47 ` Alexander Gretencord
2002-04-23 15:46 ` Ryan Phillips
2002-04-22 3:32 ` George Shapovalov
2002-04-22 6:51 ` Richard Jackson
2002-04-22 6:55 ` Ryan Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=NCEBJBHELIGGHDDGAEGNIELGDJAA.wylie@geekasylum.org \
--to=wylie@geekasylum.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox