From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,DMARC_MISSING,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from tartarus.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.34]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15qEXu-0001PY-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sun, 07 Oct 2001 08:04:46 -0600 Received: from p5a (D5E04AE0.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.74.224]) by tartarus.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B8C221747D for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2001 16:05:26 +0200 (CEST) From: "Erik Van Reeth" To: "Gentoo-Dev" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Subject: [gentoo-dev] Low Latency Patches Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Oct 7 08:05:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 16:05:25 +0200 X-Archives-Salt: 07f22880-262d-45ed-bc6f-8b6b29b92b85 X-Archives-Hash: 48c3603fa7344346a55a1d5389058490 Hi, Just a question : can one use the preemptive kernel patch and the low latency patch of Andrew Morton together or is the preemptive better than the other one. TIA Erik