From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6D02158020 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 12:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A52FE0920; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 12:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8829E0828 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 12:46:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Sam James Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6D54B616-4FF7-4935-ACE7-468EF595B704"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.200.110.1.12\)) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] pam: thoughts on modernizing pam_limits configuration that Gentoo ships with Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 12:46:03 +0000 References: <8e75c01a-e798-d822-312d-cb21b6d70d45@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <8e75c01a-e798-d822-312d-cb21b6d70d45@gentoo.org> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.200.110.1.12) X-Archives-Salt: 53464e92-99b1-4adb-846e-212839ddd527 X-Archives-Hash: 96f3d896d0ff2e735df37e47479d4694 --Apple-Mail=_6D54B616-4FF7-4935-ACE7-468EF595B704 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On 11 Dec 2022, at 08:28, Piotr Karbowski = wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I'd like to touch base on the topic of pam_limits and the defaults = that we ended up with in Gentoo. >=20 > [...] >=20 > Any thoughts? >=20 > Unless there's strong opposition to not bump those 1024/4096 current = defaults, I'd like to bump those limits. Normally I'd create a bug and = assign it to maintainer, however our sys-libs/pam maintainer has not = been seen in last half a year, so I'd end up joining as co-maintainer = there in the result. >=20 You should still file a bug for two reasons: 1. Paper trail 2. sys-auth/pambase has another maintainer who *is* active :) As for the question in your post, I'll have a think. Thanks! Best, sam --Apple-Mail=_6D54B616-4FF7-4935-ACE7-468EF595B704 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iNUEARYKAH0WIQQlpruI3Zt2TGtVQcJzhAn1IN+RkAUCY5XRDF8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MjVB NkJCODhERDlCNzY0QzZCNTU0MUMyNzM4NDA5RjUyMERGOTE5MAAKCRBzhAn1IN+R kP5XAQD9kMpF/lF6JR+M3GMtk6HgQPmWBwdTaf+bUYUmkb4QEwD/fEx1uioj2kPP QveBtoDRhMBpF+fPXYwb2zMKbg2+Aww= =ltkp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_6D54B616-4FF7-4935-ACE7-468EF595B704--