From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-73550-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836241384B4
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon,  7 Dec 2015 07:06:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E4E121C051;
	Mon,  7 Dec 2015 07:06:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 711FA21C020
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  7 Dec 2015 07:06:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.215.50.137] (public-gprs516565.centertel.pl [31.61.137.22])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mgorny)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 955493405CF;
	Mon,  7 Dec 2015 07:06:00 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <20151207053750.GA23517@meriadoc>
References: <22106.6463.805834.391338@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20151207053750.GA23517@meriadoc>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: Replacement for versionator.eclass in PMS (for EAPI 7?)
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 08:00:32 +0100
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org,Jason Zaman <perfinion@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <FA9FC2F9-A552-4CE5-98BA-3F2A83CC989D@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 3226b0c1-db50-497d-b113-46d814d38d18
X-Archives-Hash: f2a968f50c130aff87f38d4396fabfd7



Dnia 7 grudnia 2015 06:37:50 CET, Jason Zaman <perfinion@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
>On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 10:14:39PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> Questions:
>> 1. Will these three functions be sufficient, or have we overlooked
>>    anything important?
>
>Can we also have get_version_component_count() in there?
>
>I have a package that likes to change the number of parts so I need to
>know how many parts before I can split it up.
>
>Basically this:
>if [[ $(get_version_component_count) -eq 6 ]]; then
>	STUDIO_V=$(get_version_component_range 1-4)
>	BUILD_V=$(get_version_component_range 5-6)
>else
>	STUDIO_V=$(get_version_component_range 1-3)
>	BUILD_V=$(get_version_component_range 4-5)
>fi

local v=( ${PV//./} )

then ${#v[@]}. With some more work, you should be even able to use negative indexing there to avoid conditionals.

I'd rather avoid introducing extra redundant functions for corner cases.

>
>-- Jason

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.