From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, DMARC_MISSING,FREEMAIL_FROM,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mail12.speakeasy.net ([216.254.0.212]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15Wv7J-0007HB-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 01:29:29 -0600 Received: (qmail 47950 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2001 07:30:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO shrike.theboxen) ([66.92.8.183]) (envelope-sender ) by mail12.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Aug 2001 07:30:00 -0000 From: Joe Bormolini To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bunch of bugs (nothing major - skip if you're not interested) In-Reply-To: References: <20010815050414.VEDX23043.femail3.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there> X-Mailer: Spruce 0.7.6 for X11 w/smtpio 0.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Reply-To: lordjoe@bigfoot.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Aug 15 01:30:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 00:30:36 -0700 X-Archives-Salt: 0dd85845-ab16-4e42-b9c1-3abc9fb90c8b X-Archives-Hash: ac8140bbaefb69aee44018e4f27c8e98 On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Joe Bormolini wrote: > > Okay.... wowza yeah there is some silly stuff in there. Oh well new > version > of bbkeys out for a little while now. bbkeysconf is now a seperate source > package. This was my first ebuild way back when ;-) thx for the overdue > heads up > > --lordjoe Okay they should be fixed now and are in cvs... i added bbkeysconf to app-misc... i wonder if bbkeys belongs in there with it? I figured it was a really important part of the wm so i just stuck it in x11-wm but i'm having second thoughts now - any thoughts? --lordjoe