From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-53918-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315F713800E
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu,  9 Aug 2012 16:02:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 043ECE07E6;
	Thu,  9 Aug 2012 16:02:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73B9E07C6
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  9 Aug 2012 16:01:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vbbfc26 with SMTP id fc26so600332vbb.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=4p4eJoGmnW4f7+AYNXCETA2Vzq9Q6UppBs8Z1N6YM4g=;
        b=sVp8sGxaJi4Y0Cg2fGF+hGr88h2rMYmhr3JxWCC63paz/DZXr6yqHWDE8sErMDjXEl
         le4ahwXAcz3OaSg0Hiy+Dg9HmlO+u453XMdbADPH4xYRyEjvnmPOYjTlXYvV3KM10siw
         MbyRiX475Aygswb+mbB8eiPryXlBAtf8ZPlqc1xS2kTSggFoMC3o5no7hgwbu3oB/qgU
         W3mA77oAHNcGjiIB2Qj6pY+ssUx/pMn07hVKgGclqggw2IvpXGNlyUtrQ8UoXkv0Vxxn
         iQ1LJetBrxlDj6VxjQeGCfNf8chBlGFkOqcvfiFEsmo6lKdvCuYNQJ1e3u7Rf0fo2Lj5
         hZNA==
Received: by 10.52.174.52 with SMTP id bp20mr15135967vdc.29.1344528066176;
 Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.59.8.10 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_maCht2j2DSEDCNCPYZufk0cTx1ahrYz30uFThst3EWbw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACR_K2tKrkCBmsbBXen-Fqx3JYjpWq-qYGCHxEv6C4B9zh1t2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <1344366029.24762.31.camel@TesterTop4> <502377E7.8010803@gentoo.org>
 <20120809140228.18316.qmail@stuge.se> <CAGfcS_maCht2j2DSEDCNCPYZufk0cTx1ahrYz30uFThst3EWbw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wyatt Epp <wyatt.epp@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:00:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPCkgLkn+E5WBHDMQ9xyxs8BEee3ekaQWh3ghcG1BG2uL2xQgw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] pid 1 design
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: f64e13f1-4bc8-4da7-a3f1-76607d2a9d51
X-Archives-Hash: 5ad641fe145695172a963d6b7e579d99

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> ...have an init as PID=1 that does
> nothing but launch systemd and keep it propped up until it gets a
> signal from systemd.  However, that could have issues I'm just not
> thinking of.

I'm not the maintainer, but this method does seem to work pretty well
for OpenRC and our old friend baselayout-1 (so, the last decade or so,
as I understand it).