From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-70302-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1238C138CA2
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:52:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C4DDE08F4;
	Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:52:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com (mail-oi0-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CA5EE08AF
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:51:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by oift201 with SMTP id t201so160650928oif.3
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=SgYJfsG/evLx7bkmP2wuhiql3msP4dlZlbCQf7fxtUA=;
        b=deN1WYovwtSUyr66o30XSp2YCJNS4WSgT30n4LRe8URzJea/974tNIANYeBo1w+5Pr
         9ZijhoaZZVBgn0opm0aiDNS7cydg/onEpdOituYBZcQNEuEnppGLq+mN7iTk3IhnwvEU
         78mhjEn1g4yBe3VIs/5eno2n/hdw6YERVqGldT6SW1hquMBMDScn+LVgX+FU1BPhEubw
         +Y8M8UMDlprGMWQQoJ+k0UE62N6DRAR/3ruUvTWmTOGk/qVP+s3lJymFhJJmFTNZhXZ4
         Vgf9UYrvQ+ye72BJM45hWeLZOCMlfBpWIIw1HRkLT9K4+UmGwCby6/7JgIDvutkkunRd
         tcdg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.180.136 with SMTP id d130mr18927172oif.90.1429638718835;
 Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: alon.barlev@gmail.com
Received: by 10.202.104.86 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m3pp6xwfal.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
References: <CAOazyz3fwV4hmO3ZAKuSZ9fdFPdBjF6u2R286KkxVJihfXWZ3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<m3pp6xwfal.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 20:51:58 +0300
X-Google-Sender-Auth: VfDSH6xBPN1v4I30_UD5GZnAnuM
Message-ID: <CAOazyz233z1z8-+HihTZM_m18cp4Bn08LRrBqh4_udRRhcRubQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] bugs.gentoo.org and dnssec
From: Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: c219af64-74cd-40c0-98aa-013bf07e344d
X-Archives-Hash: 4eb837e4b85c3ffa86756f710045971f

On 21 April 2015 at 20:40, James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "AB" == Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl@gentoo.org> writes:
>
> AB> When using bugs.gentoo.org with dnsmasq and dnssec enabled, I cannot
> AB> access attachments.
>
> It works here using a local unbound.
>
> But dnsmasq had some growth pains when it added dnssec verification, due
> to its bottom-up rather than the ususal top-down approach.
>
> AIUI, the current release should work.
>
> If you see that issue with 2.72 or later, they'd like to hear about it.
>
> Their list is:  dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
>

Thanks!
I suspected that.
Yes, I am using 2.72, I will send message.