From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RAZF3-0008W5-Q1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 03:30:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC1C021C0E2; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 03:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432B821C075 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 03:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzt12 with SMTP id zt12so6033969bkb.40 for ; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 20:30:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xJ/gVt1tO8AM/Zevca4s4dUCxld7Ir74MB1xDULCsbA=; b=PhTIN5dR9T9bAh6DzLZjiG0Fn+ZwKjPYbJ+7IX7INcpWv5tdKodmhlxzlXjA7Fpykf H97klztxRiqRkXK6Cb8WrUyHVkZd4BP2GTigua62SuDiOvsoYGhnbupt3juPsveW/5Ju Q9p2fq1sJOyJ0ZzeYw2777wOkSZiie/5m8NOs= Received: by 10.223.91.147 with SMTP id n19mr12015689fam.53.1317612394165; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 20:26:34 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: arunissatan@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.116.208 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 20:26:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E881EC1.5030008@gentoo.org> References: <20111001170259.E4D702004B@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <4E875C08.4050906@gentoo.org> <4E87A5E2.2030709@gentoo.org> <4E881EC1.5030008@gentoo.org> From: Arun Raghavan Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 08:56:14 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: P1MuwcTfaJ4v5VeSCWn_lxJv6oc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b34c79b317958d6449354aab9977d6fc On 2 October 2011 13:50, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 10/02/2011 02:44 AM, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n wrote: [...] >> Bug 361181 is certainly on my TODO list, just not very high up to now. >> If you think that there is some urgency in getting rid of the package, >> please do explain so in advance. > > The time ran out with opening of http://bugs.gentoo.org/384733 for > linux-headers reverse deps to be tracked stable. > > I've removed qutecom for you again. Removing the package again seems to just be unnecessary when the maintainer has stated that he'll fix the problem. Would masking it till it was fixed not suffice? Seems like a bit unjustified to me (from information on this thread alone). Cheers, --=20 Arun Raghavan http://arunraghavan.net/ (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)