From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-60793-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016D01381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:48:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5868E099B;
	Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:48:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-f52.google.com (mail-oa0-f52.google.com [209.85.219.52])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF0D4E0983
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:48:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id g12so1746057oah.25
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 05:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=A4HulJV/3gegUtP1p/yPIFWQYCds5rguqM/XxPEhfmY=;
        b=G1C4S+6JOu8Hz0OWybugOBkMuJXV4stb8SH0Lw6U19IrFOb83vIMWec4uNOt1INTOr
         U1IsWoRKK91pnfus0p31yseK6Ud+3gngppP+rvzM3MLX9hMwD4p0V1UmQhyPrweTdK4b
         JmZPbaTDGNdeTr3CntMz+gAomXhwtTNH3nkiULGiGrXyuoNcHOibAo1667xlNmq8x8Cn
         s3CeiaK4rfdju2osZKPIyV6HtnwM7WxnGzqcySZbzmp0f5M0eRnyObyZrT+2+i15dW0d
         HB8YXBkOKBXMBXOin4xkzC0uvby2y1Z6sRCqW5m2jBfMtehQDxJwu/K3VBC+SyRsGrbE
         GH4g==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.94.72 with SMTP id da8mr3737267oeb.123.1371300501942;
 Sat, 15 Jun 2013 05:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.133.147 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 05:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHcsgXQgRRN_X=WB3M6SzkubotfovmWg=guA5vte8Z9PAdudOw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <51BC2C55.7010506@mva.name>
	<CAHcsgXQgRRN_X=WB3M6SzkubotfovmWg=guA5vte8Z9PAdudOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:48:21 +0400
Message-ID: <CAO-1Pb7SMzoq-jkt6kxD=2Bfh3ijnp-xajz2PvEYJM4r_mo8Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SRC_URI behaviour
From: Alexander V Vershilov <alexander.vershilov@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 197b1a14-dbc7-4fee-a5e4-ca68f3414494
X-Archives-Hash: 4dd4055f7432cedcc60f37549172e294

On 15 June 2013 15:50, Diego Elio Petten=F2 <flameeyes@flameeyes.eu> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov <mva@mva.name>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> And, moreover, I guess, SRC_URI can even be used for VCS:
>>
>> SRC_URI=3D"
>>         git+ssh://github.com/lol/moo.git
>>         hg+ssh://bitbucket.org/lol/moo
>>         svn+ssh://assembla.com/lol/moo
>> "
>
>
> Over my dead CVS access.
>

Can you elaborate:
 do you object both proposals (about partial restrict and VCS-support)
or only second
one (VCS-support)?

It seems that there were no technical discussions about first one and
it seems quite
reasonable.

--
Alexander