From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4E21381F3 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BD7FE0962; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (mail-ob0-f175.google.com [209.85.214.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F21BE0919 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:36:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id xn12so2081617obc.20 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 00:36:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zrv02PK38uGg7DEel7pYqMl2dD21m0wqAhcpzFlijbQ=; b=DmcZ59jKubo2+5sIsyHDs+8N+Bjx4LcfBMQPcLMDPu+LG5JBX50y8mcTaOEsarsuMU OpeC6LyPDaYWxaP8UoFlBOKwmZPnVt+8Nd4dTQ4hwErtIq42C/hImQiJsNXlRFCEUTvo u2q06S3fbYzrKKyvPpP1IbnJ/F9UMnOTXO/UzFo5E8woIanDMHW1g+MOYqGtKIqtrq8R IQmqTy2kL23CF+ioXUSSmppqjlpqC1aP7OfissDI5Mb+Mv3+NdY1oVUd0iM0H/1CD6rN J18wjmG3QQqHHItz3OgzTk/qgmZEe5rY0FvVIIrUWT8em9QE5gd9ENzzXgPEYwUimg3T VBRQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.81.202 with SMTP id c10mr5892320oby.27.1371368210287; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 00:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.133.147 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 00:36:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51BD3A2A.5040903@gentoo.org> References: <20130612185126.15f142b0@gentoo.org> <51B8A904.6060406@gentoo.org> <20130612180255.59f313b3@googlemail.com> <51B8AA59.8010603@gentoo.org> <20130612181312.774d0bd1@googlemail.com> <51B8AE78.5030702@orlitzky.com> <51BD3A2A.5040903@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:36:50 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Over-reliance of Gentoo projects on overlays From: Alexander V Vershilov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 0225261c-4267-4d28-a8e5-543639091413 X-Archives-Hash: 603dbdd0843239f7ef9b0f1c274cd90f On 16 June 2013 08:08, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." wro= te: > On 6/12/13 11:51 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> Still seems like working in gentoo-x86 without doing stabilization >> would cover most of those bases. Working in the unstable main tree is >> still a lot better than keeping stuff out there in an overlay, IMO. > > +1 > > This works really well for the Gentoo Chromium team, where we have just > hard masked packages and ~arch packages right in the tree. In this is a continuation of a 'gentoo-haskell' sub-thread I have to say th= at Chromium and co. it not a development library this is a end user applicatio= n. End user applications should be in tree (except for some testing reasons), = if not just ignore this letter. And thanks for your work. -- Alexander