From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126F5138010 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10B0621C018; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5678121C165 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com (mail-oa0-f53.google.com [209.85.219.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ottxor) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C694E33D149 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oagj6 with SMTP id j6so1215779oag.40 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.177.100 with SMTP id cp4mr1705238obc.71.1348700240797; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.151.68 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:57:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <50637878.1080500@gentoo.org> From: Christoph Junghans Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:57:00 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ship app-arch/pbzip2 instead of app-arch/bzip2 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 76ae72e9-8c45-4708-8746-776e366d49ff X-Archives-Hash: 6c77d09a61fa51b47802e7d3e065e0a0 2012/9/26 Mike Gilbert : > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Michael Mol wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB= =85n >> wrote: >>> Michael Mol schrieb: >>>> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install >>>> media be replaced with >>>> pbzip2. >>> >>> If I understand correctly, pbzip2 depends on bzip2. So what you are >>> asking is that pbzip2 is preferred over bzip2 when both are installed, >>> and that pbzip2 is installed by default? >> >> pbzip2 uses libbzip2, which I understand bzip2 to also be a wrapper arou= nd. >> > > libbz2 is built and installed by the app-arch/bzip2 package. Thus, > app-arch/pbzip2 depends on app-arch/bzip2, unless someone rips libbz2 > out into a separate ebuild. That sound like a plan. Maybe bzip2 should become a virtual as busybox also provides an implementation. --=20 Christoph Junghans http://dev.gentoo.org/~ottxor/