From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE1A138B11 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BC3F21C017; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E1D0E0509 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ve0-f182.google.com (mail-ve0-f182.google.com [209.85.128.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ottxor) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BEDD33DEAA for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f182.google.com with SMTP id ox1so5994808veb.13 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:16:40 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.52.67.133 with SMTP id n5mr18399468vdt.24.1361290600336; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:16:40 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.216.233 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:16:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1361287306.3997.233.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> References: <20130219131033.GN9772@schlaumatte.Speedport_W723_V_Typ_A_1_00_096> <1361287306.3997.233.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> From: Christoph Junghans Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:16:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we list sys-apps/sed in DEPEND To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: cfac57e4-f656-44df-85c8-9fcbd365e778 X-Archives-Hash: b60acf21cb3b21e9dedbe95e796bd3a8 2013/2/19 Brian Dolbec : > On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:10 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote: >> ... if it is used in the ebuild? >> >> It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere? >> >> Cheers, >> Thomas >> > > Only if the pkg is also a system package. I recently ran into a problem > running a catalyst build because portage-utils did not list the xz-utils > dep which was another system package. It failed to unpack because > xz-utils was still waiting to be merged. I was running catalyst with > --jobs=3. That is what unpacker_src_uri_depends from unpacker.eclass is intended for. DEPEND+=$(unpacker_src_uri_depends) > > -- Christoph Junghans http://dev.gentoo.org/~ottxor/