From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E3F138010 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6B6DE002D; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com (mail-oa0-f53.google.com [209.85.219.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A781E0462 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id j6so4343077oag.40 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 08:42:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7HWJrep6ZnvnKYzl77gQzTtuSokHYgO8ofZHD+BmYbM=; b=Q702ccfagrEJ/e12blTbPOdJFITZF40rxrlAbfyuc2dNpVI/PVbK2HJ7MjqDDctwBg AZEUeoLowpWfWSKqtaZu7H+mcd+dDNu5tR1LFy+A/q/pb+kuRn5xtIi7un+cT1HWTltq RFk/KENOsBbMyopA5o3TenVDqYhkdB1a8Lal/p6gFbw/A6up6nixPmW6m+7cfZeJcZmr nf/ksYZMDeWkIz3v18xl/CPRpLmPz7zRjqvUfUUPEnczZWiJmrMkJmD/GJak3KlrNT/d LUC4ALfk9ZOosQ26zoIeGP1KmmDJ1pKmtEjBWmvQwEUteD8gVcVfQVrEv6puP1ZM11Md e3gQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.12.42 with SMTP id v10mr7454699oeb.131.1350229352511; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 08:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.3.37 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 08:42:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201210111522.17665.vapier@gentoo.org> <50782949.4040509@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 10:42:32 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: removing "server" profile variants from profiles.desc From: Ben Kohler To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb20524ebfae004cc06c407 X-Archives-Salt: 66b3c703-40bc-4f40-8c0f-fa467154d9ed X-Archives-Hash: 342a9c4fa677dbae66583cee8d8e2645 --e89a8fb20524ebfae004cc06c407 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I hope this discussion doesn't end when the warnings are removed. These server profiles are still useless and misleading, they do not need to exist in their current form. Your previous statement that these are the most minimal profiles, is not accurate. The base profiles are the most minimal (non-selinux) ones. -Ben On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Pielmeier > wrote: > > Markos Chandras schrieb am 12.10.2012 10:08: > >> > >> +1. I want these profiles to *staty*. I am using this profile on my > >> "home boxes". It is the most minimal profile as the rest of the > >> profiles pull in too much useless stuff. What is wrong with these > >> profiles anyway? > >> > > > > If you want a minimal profile you don't need the server profile. > > > > "ln -s ${PORTDIR}/profiles/default/linux/${ARCH}/10.0 make.profile" > > gives you a minimal profile. > > > > -- > > Regards > > Daniel > > > > I removed the ewarn message from the amd64/10.0/server profile. If > nobody objects I will remove it from the x86 as well (CC'ing x86 to > get their attention) > > -- > Regards, > Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 > > --e89a8fb20524ebfae004cc06c407 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I hope this discussion doesn't end when the warnings are removed. =A0Th= ese server profiles are still useless and misleading, they do not need to e= xist in their current form. =A0Your previous statement that these are the m= ost minimal profiles, is not accurate. =A0The base profiles are the most mi= nimal (non-selinux) ones.

-Ben


--e89a8fb20524ebfae004cc06c407--