From: Ben Kohler <bkohler@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: removing "server" profile variants from profiles.desc
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 10:42:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANSUr=KnuuLP1ZpLRSA6xzGeAzq0eANX_ec+LgKkwi-meXr4rA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG2jQ8hvDUcDv78Jpjpd1WpUpezcJzYaJQomRjgVAAR+rayxHA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1244 bytes --]
I hope this discussion doesn't end when the warnings are removed. These
server profiles are still useless and misleading, they do not need to exist
in their current form. Your previous statement that these are the most
minimal profiles, is not accurate. The base profiles are the most minimal
(non-selinux) ones.
-Ben
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Pielmeier <billie@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> > Markos Chandras schrieb am 12.10.2012 10:08:
> >>
> >> +1. I want these profiles to *staty*. I am using this profile on my
> >> "home boxes". It is the most minimal profile as the rest of the
> >> profiles pull in too much useless stuff. What is wrong with these
> >> profiles anyway?
> >>
> >
> > If you want a minimal profile you don't need the server profile.
> >
> > "ln -s ${PORTDIR}/profiles/default/linux/${ARCH}/10.0 make.profile"
> > gives you a minimal profile.
> >
> > --
> > Regards
> > Daniel
> >
>
> I removed the ewarn message from the amd64/10.0/server profile. If
> nobody objects I will remove it from the x86 as well (CC'ing x86 to
> get their attention)
>
> --
> Regards,
> Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1841 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-14 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-11 18:56 [gentoo-dev] Proposal: removing "server" profile variants from profiles.desc Ben Kohler
2012-10-11 19:03 ` Peter Stuge
2012-10-11 19:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-10-11 19:29 ` Rich Freeman
2012-10-11 20:04 ` Walter Dnes
2012-10-11 22:22 ` Gregory M. Turner
2012-10-11 22:31 ` Ben Kohler
2012-10-12 11:43 ` Gregory M. Turner
2012-10-12 8:10 ` Markos Chandras
2012-10-12 8:08 ` Markos Chandras
2012-10-12 8:18 ` Rich Freeman
2012-10-12 9:11 ` Markos Chandras
2012-10-12 13:53 ` Mike Gilbert
2012-10-12 14:13 ` Ben Kohler
2012-10-12 14:29 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2012-10-14 10:00 ` Markos Chandras
2012-10-14 15:42 ` Ben Kohler [this message]
2012-10-14 19:54 ` Markos Chandras
2012-10-15 4:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-10-15 11:28 ` Rich Freeman
2012-10-15 15:20 ` Zac Medico
2012-10-15 17:45 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-10-30 8:17 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-10-17 15:06 ` Ben Kohler
2012-10-18 0:37 ` Peter Stuge
2012-10-18 8:34 ` Markos Chandras
2012-10-12 12:46 ` Sergey Popov
2012-10-12 13:36 ` Rich Freeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANSUr=KnuuLP1ZpLRSA6xzGeAzq0eANX_ec+LgKkwi-meXr4rA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=bkohler@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox