From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB50B1381FA for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 18:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B3E8E0979; Fri, 30 May 2014 18:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f44.google.com (mail-qg0-f44.google.com [209.85.192.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F950E093A for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 18:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id i50so6414998qgf.3 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 11:08:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=m30lDlNxwAdIyt01hT+l/8mRzLFUuiU6jo23oyZYAcM=; b=enm0XH5msdW9Jw3SP7GSJ7rpW6lK3okokkz0WIij6VD73L8uEjsYj47pzS6VlKJ9cg hAnNmXBUjjnI3OIk7E7ZP4myMgZpvy1ntYS7lcVTgnE+E4m9AW13ZeK53HztLusyV2q8 LJwEDGy2wS+oV2c49nNezROCKdSyvY8sgE/7TeOD0Q6Gaq/hvmJpBkEQvN8nWofiXZOK jWxQa0jAOswIyMQB+u3lm5rt43WKvB89vkzlbDrRPIzEEhiNh15Sm95HFWS/7wK1FKRa LXFZ0gHgj2ssd4+k24RQv/QsWcnYwLf3aHetYYgPeRBypIqQldSkeSgOHztmACBhAvOg ZSug== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.91.161 with SMTP id z30mr22036423qgd.65.1401473330522; Fri, 30 May 2014 11:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.141.34 with HTTP; Fri, 30 May 2014 11:08:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140530195913.10e51302@gentoo.org> References: <53889F70.1090404@gentoo.org> <20140530181022.6b263cde@gentoo.org> <5388AEF6.7040204@gentoo.org> <5388B13E.5090700@gentoo.org> <20140530185038.464e3bca@gentoo.org> <20140530195913.10e51302@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 13:08:50 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? From: Ben Kohler To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a84d2074efe04faa1f021 X-Archives-Salt: 26dc09d5-7015-4538-9f54-f42b736a45c7 X-Archives-Hash: d43272cd7e410b72d842a3e1c7821754 --001a113a84d2074efe04faa1f021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > > Good idea, we really could use some kind of kernel seeds in the Portage > tree; if someone is willing to maintain them, knowing that Pappy has > maintained them for years and spoke about it it seems like hard work. > > Remember that these "kernel seeds" are actually pretty far from what we need for genkernel defaults (at least the way we currently recommend using it in our install handbook). The kernel seeds provide a good sane kernel config *with little or no specific hardware support*. But I'm definitely in favor of separately packaging the kernel configs. -Ben --001a113a84d2074efe04faa1f021 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On F= ri, May 30, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@gentoo.org> wrote:
Good idea, we really could use some kind of kernel seeds in the Portage
tree; if someone is willing to maintain them, knowing that Pappy has
maintained them for years and spoke about it it seems like hard work.
Remember that these "kernel seeds" are actual= ly pretty far from what we need for genkernel defaults (at least the way we= currently recommend using it in our install handbook). =C2=A0The kernel se= eds provide a good sane kernel config *with little or no specific hardware = support*.

But I'm definitely in favor of separately packaging= the kernel configs.

-Ben=C2=A0
<= /div> --001a113a84d2074efe04faa1f021--