From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4529138247 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 15:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CBF6E0B80; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 15:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f177.google.com (mail-qc0-f177.google.com [209.85.216.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48791E0B22 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 15:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m20so2756987qcx.36 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:49:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=IjY6YZsa7smYfq0zl41hphzqJSEhlQz8Ym+XxYw2AcE=; b=zTCLmdMrVjAX+UBjIsSwSBK18FDhZpgRlgyMx8YyvSDKcxWM3WtHzLAuUHoF4dkQE8 bXylaTtsAJRJmWWzLyey77I/uK7IHnQNhYr1abU/f38sUOH94agv8V0ZykdMRFroIOm5 6jK91qg2lDxuA17nfY+azWxHA6qIN0F8B5PTGNgZDzMQUWnh32hHWNpdGD/+it+2vF8f F7NvMTkVKxHRthe6tkHXmZwqFVnE5DMq9JuZ1vxwZ63TvbbaazV0xPKappZPQqAPPSt1 pQzKCVv/UN+gh0NP6QvuKwqvuKeDCSxR3fkH1+2BoOBvhRptEtXUVSKsglTlcyXGSk5L u5og== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.17.232 with SMTP id r8mr8825651qed.74.1389282568674; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:49:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.131.41 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 07:49:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52ce9994.24f5980a.0660.342e@mx.google.com> References: <52ce4eab.463f700a.4b43.16bd@mx.google.com> <52ce9994.24f5980a.0660.342e@mx.google.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 09:49:28 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage QOS From: Ben Kohler To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bea3be4ffa0ae04ef8b8d16 X-Archives-Salt: 12f7ee51-4b3a-405c-bdc9-f96b4688e926 X-Archives-Hash: 2a146b54f23dc0fa16bbdbe8a6e75b91 --047d7bea3be4ffa0ae04ef8b8d16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Igor wrote: > > > According to distro watch: > > ... > According to Linux Counter > > ... > "What are distro watch and linux counter and who cares what their opt-in stats gathering says?" -most Gentoo users I've ever talked to I think if you drop the premise "Gentoo is dying, how do we fix it?" and just focus on "Here are some ideas on how we can improve Gentoo", you'll get a better response here. From what I see (IRC activity, new ebuild activity, bugzilla activity, etc), our community seems stronger than ever. I think a lot of us are puzzled that you think Gentoo has "stopped". You have some great ideas but this is not a sinking ship scenario. -Ben --047d7bea3be4ffa0ae04ef8b8d16 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= hu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Igor <lanthruster@gmail.com>= wrote:


According to distro watch:=A0

...
According to Linux Counter=A0

...

"What are distro watch a= nd linux counter and who cares what their opt-in stats gathering says?"= ;
-most Gentoo users I've ever talked to

I think if you drop the premise "Gentoo is dying, how do we fix i= t?" and just focus on "Here are some ideas on how we can improve = Gentoo", you'll get a better response here. =A0From what I see (IR= C activity, new ebuild activity, bugzilla activity, etc), our community see= ms stronger than ever. =A0I think a lot of us are puzzled that you think Ge= ntoo has "stopped". =A0

You have some great ideas but this is not a sinking shi= p scenario.

-Ben

--047d7bea3be4ffa0ae04ef8b8d16--